Resultados de aprendizagem no quadro do ensino superior português: definição e medida
Main Article Content
Abstract
Os resultados de aprendizagem assumem-se como importante ferramenta no quadro do Ensino Superior, já que permitem descrever os conhecimentos e competências que se espera que os estudantes demonstrem no final da sua formação. Este estudo descreve o nível de implementação, dos resultados de aprendizagem no contexto nacional, explorando quais as competências mais valorizadas nos perfis de saída dos seus diplomados (1º, 2º e 3º ciclos). Partindo de uma metodologia mista, foi elaborada uma matriz de análise, validada teórica e empiricamente. Esta taxonomia integra competências específicas à área científica e um conjunto alargado de competências transversais, possibilitando uma leitura compreensiva dos resultados de aprendizagem.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Aamodt, P. O., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2008). Assessing Higher Education learning outcomes as a result of institutional and individual characteristics. Outcomes of Higher Education: Quality relevance and impact. Paris.
Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes; A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing “learning outcomes” at the local, national and international levels. United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 1-2 July 2004, Heriot-Watt University (Edinburgh Conference Centre), (July), 30. http://doi.org/Heriot-Watt University
Adam, S. (2006). An introduction to learning outcomes. In F. E., J. Kohler, L. Purser, & L. Wilson (Eds.), EUA Bologna Handbook. Berlin: Raabe.
Adam, S. (2008). Learning Outcomes based Higher Education: The Scottish experiences. In Paper presented to the Bologna Seminar. Edinburgh.
Allen, J., & Van der Velden, R. (2005). The Flexible professional in the knowledge society: Conceptual framework of the REFLEX project. Maastricht. The Netherlands.
CEDEFOP. (2011). When defining learning outcomes in curricula, every learner matters. World, (April), 1–4.
CEDEFOP. (2008). The Shift To Learning Outcomes. Office, 56.
Dias, D., & Amaral, A. (2014). Assessment of Higher Education learning outcomes (AHELO): Feasibility Study. In M. J. Rosa & A.
Amaral (Eds.), Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Contemporary Debates. (pp. 66–86). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4_8
Dias, D., & Soares, D. (2016). Retrieving civic dimensions in Higher Education curricula: Is learning improving students’ civic development? In EDULEARN16 Proceedings (pp. 8159–8166). http://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0785
Dias, D., & Soares, D. (2017). Learning outcomes in Higher Education: Designing a conceptual map for portuguese academia. In INTED2017 (pp. 9188–9194). Valencia: IATED. http://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2170
European Commission. (2008). Improving competences for the 21st century: An agenda for european cooperation on schools. Commission Staff Working Document (Vol. 53). Brussels.
Ewell, P. (2005). Enhancing alumni research: European and american perspectives. New Directions for Institutional Research, 126, 19–29.
Gallavara, G., Hreinsson, E., Kajaste, M., & Zadeh, M. S. (2008). Learning outcomes: Common framework – different approaches to evaluation learning outcomes in the Nordic countries. Helsinki.
Garcia-Aracil, A., & Van der Valden, R. (2008). Competencies for young European higher education graduates: Labor market mismatches and their payoffs. Higher Education, 55, 219–239.
Gonzalez, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2003). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Final Report. Pilot Project – Phase 1. Deusto-Groningen.
Joint Quality Initiative informal group. (2004). Shared “Dublin” descriptors for Short Cycle, First Cycle, Second Cycle and Third Cycle Awards. Dublin.
Moon, J. (2004). Linking evels, learning outcomes and assessment criteria. In Paper presented at the Seminar “Using Learning Outocomes (pp. 1–30). Edinburgh.
Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of learning outcomes in Higher Education. OECD Education Working Papers, (15). http://doi.org/10.1787/244257272573
OECD. (2013). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes (AHELO): Feasibility Study Report, Vol. 3, Further Insights (Vol. 3).
Reason, R. D., & Hemer, K. (2012). Civic learning and engagement: A review of the literature on civic learning, assessment, and instruments. Iowa State.
Scott, I. (2011). The Learning Ooutcome in Higher Education: Time to think again ? Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, (5), 1–8.
Shavelson, R. J., & Huang, L. (2003). Responding responsibly to the frenzy to assess learning in higher education. Change, 31, 10–19.
Stanley, J. (2015). Learning outcomes: From policy discourse to practice. European Journal of Education, 50(4), 404–419. http://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12150
Tissot, P. (2008). Terminology of education and training policy: A multilingual glossary. (CEDEFOP, Ed.). Luxembourg.
Tremblay, K., Lalancette, D., Roseveare, D., Dias, D., & Amaral, A. (2013). Assessment of Higher Education learning outcomes (AHELO): Feasibility Study. Feasibility Study Report, 1, 66–86. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4_8
Veiga, A., Rosa, M. J., Dias, D., & Amaral, A. (2013). Why is it difficult to grasp the impacts of the Portuguese quality assurance system? European Journal of Education, 48(3), 454–470. http://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12040
Werquin, P. (2012). The missing link to connect education and employment: recognition of non-formal and informal learning outcomes☆. Journal of Education and Work, 25(3), 259–278. http://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.687574
Wiliam, D. (2010). The role of formative assessment in effective learning environment. In OECD (Ed.), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice. Paris.