Main Article Content

Giselle Elias Miranda
Universidade do Minho
Brazil
Ana Tomás de Almeida
Universidade do Minho
Portugal
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-312X
Maria Ângela Mattar Yunes
Universidade Salgado de Oliveira
Brazil
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4653-3895
Vol. 9 (2022), Número monográfico XVI CIG-PP, pages 132-145
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2022.9.0.8897
Submitted: Jan 10, 2022 Accepted: Mar 19, 2022 Published: Apr 29, 2022
How to Cite

Abstract

Family reunification is a complex process that begins with the residential care of the child and/or young person in an institution and includes the period after their return home, and can contribute for the success of protection measures. The present study aimed to analyse the dynamics that generate processes of resilience in families after the implementation of the “Walking in Family Program”, which intends to give support to family reunification through the promotion of parenting skills during institutionalization. A qualitative, descriptive and retrospective case study was developed. The non-probabilistic sample consisted of 4 families, 5 parents and 6 children/young people who left foster care in 2019 and were able to reunify. The participation of families in the program confirmed the strengthening of resilience processes in the relational system of parents and children triggered by the understanding, training and empowerment raised in the different stages of the protection measure. The conceptual association of two theoretical models of family resilience of the authors Froma Walsh and Lietz and Strength, enabled us to identify different individual and family strengths and resources in crisis management and specific responses to the needs of families at different stages since the children’s entry in residential care to their returning home. The results reinforce the importance of socio-educational programs that reinforce and encourage dimensions that promote healthy aspects that build resilience in families. These elements could guide interventions for safe and stable family reunification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Axford, N., Elliott, D.S., & Little, M. (2012). Blueprints for Europe: Promoting evidence-based programmes in children’s services. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2012a11

Balsells, M. À., Pastor, C., Amorós, P., Mateos, A., Ponce, C., & Navajas, A. (2014). Child Welfare and Successful Reunification through the Socio-Educative Process: Training Needs among Biological Families in Spain. Social Sciences, 3(4), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3040809

Balsells, M. À., Pastor, C., Amorós, P., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Molina, M. C., Mateos, A., Vázquez, N. (2015). Caminar en familia: Programa de competencias parentales durante el acogimiento y la reunificación familiar. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad.

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Delgado, P., & Gersão, E. (2018). O acolhimento de crianças e jovens no novo quadro legal. Novos discursos, novas práticas? Análise Social, 226, (1),112-134.

Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blase, K., Friedman, R., Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tamps, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.

Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation. Prevention Science, 16(7), 893-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x

Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Instituto da Segurança Social, I. P. (2020). CASA 2019 - Relatório de Caracterização Anual da Situação de Acolhimento das Crianças e Jovens. https://www.seg-social.pt/publicacoes?kw=CASA

Lietz, C. A., & Strength, M. (2011). Stories of Successful Reunification: A Narrative Study of Family Resilience in Child Welfare. Families in Society, 92(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4102

Marotti, J., Galhardo, A. P. M., Furuyama, R. J., Pigozzo, M. N., Campos, T. N., Laganá, D. C. (2008). Amostragem em pesquisa clínica: tamanho da amostra. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, 20 (2), 186-194.

Minayo, M. C. S., Costa, A. P. (2018). Fundamentos Teóricos das Técnicas de Investigação Qualitativa. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 40, 139-153. https://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/rleducacao/article/view/6439

Walsh, F. (1996). Family resilience: A concept and its application. Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x

Walsh, F. (1998) Strengthening family resilience. The Guilford Press.

Walsh, F. (2005). Fortalecendo a resiliência familiar. Editora Roca.

Walsh, F. (2016). Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training, Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the possible. Family Process, 55, 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12260

Walsh, F. (2016a). Family resilience: a developmental systems framework [

Resiliência familiar: uma estrutura de sistemas de desenvolvimento]. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1154035

Yunes, M. A. M. (2003). Psicologia positiva e resiliência: O foco no indivíduo e na família. Psicologia em Estudo, 8, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722003000300010

Yunes, M. A. M. (2015). Dimensões conceituais da resiliência e suas interfaces com risco e proteção. In S. Murta, C. Leandro-França, K. Brito, & L. Polejack (Orgs), Prevenção e Promoção em Saúde Mental: Fundamentos, Planejamento e Estratégias de Intervenção (pp. 93-112). Synopisis.