A revisão como um instrumento para a melhoria da qualidade de textos narrativos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.3030Keywords:
Aprendizagem, Memória, MotivaçãoAbstract
Pretendemos avaliar o impacto na escrita de textos narrativos, de um programa de escrita, em que os alunos têm acesso a instrumentos de autorregulação para a revisão dos textos. Quisemos perceber se o recurso à utilização de grelhas e ao feedback do professor influenciava a qualidade dos textos escritos. Participaram 71 crianças do 4º ano, divididas em 3 grupos experimentais, (submetidas a um programa de intervenção) e 1 de controlo. Os resultados demonstraram que os alunos que utilizaram as grelhas e receberam o feedback aumentaram a qualidade dos seus textos.
Downloads
References
Alamargot, D., & Fayol, M. (2009). Modeling the
development of written transcription. In R. Beard,
D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, & J. Riley (Eds.), Handbook
of Writing development (pp.23- 47). London:Sage.
Arias-Gundín & García-Sánchez, (2008). Implicaciones
educativas de los modelos teóricos del proceso de
revisión textual. Papeles del Psicólogo, 29(2).
Barbeiro, L. B., & Pereira, L. A. (no prelo). O ensino da
escrita: a dimensão textual. Lisboa: Ministério da
Educação.
Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991).
Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing
disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57-79
Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue
in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of
interactive cover sheets. Assessment Evaluation in
Higher Education, 35(3), 291-300.
doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045
Cohen, A. D. & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on
compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports.In B.
Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights
Cuetos, F., Ramos, J. L., & Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC.
Evaluación de los procesos de escritura. Madrid: TEA.
Dias, P., & Santos, L. (2013).Práticas Avaliativas para
promoção da autorregulação da aprendizagem
matemática: O feedback escrito em relatórios escritos
em duas fases. Quadrante. Vol. XXII.
Englert, C., Raphael, T., Anderson, L., Anthony, H.&
Stevens, D. Fear. (1991). Making writing strategies
in and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction
writing in regular and special education classrooms.
American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-373.
Fayol, M. (2004). Text and cognition. In Handbook of
children’s literacy (pp. 181-197). Springer Netherlands.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_10
Fayol, M. (2007). La production de textes et son
apprentissage. Écrire des textes, l ‘apprentissage et
le plaisir, 21. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision
in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481-506
Fidalgo, R., & García, J. N. (2008). El desarrollo de la
competencia escrita a través de una enseñanza
metacognitiva de la escritura. Cultura y Educación,
(3), 325-346.
doi.org/10.1174/113564008785826321
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to
student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B.
Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research
insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reaction to
teacher response in multiple-draft composition
classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29.1,33–53.
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for
identifying student blockages during transitions in
the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 143-162.
doi:10.1007/BF02655886
Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in
learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 82, 781-791
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-
regulation and transcription skills in writing and
writing development. Educational Psycologist,
(1), 3–12.
doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive
writing to students with learning disabilities: A
meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 101,
-272
Hayes, J. e L. Flower (1986). “Writing research and the
writer”. American psychologist, 41(10), 1106-1113
Hayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding
cognition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano & J. R.
Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research,
theory and practice (pp. 6-44). Newark, DE:
International Reading Association
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the
organization of the writing process. In L. W.Gregg
& E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in
writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Hayes, J. (2006). New Directions in Writing Theory. In.:
Macarthur, Ca Graham, S. Fitzgerald, J.(Org.).
Handbook of Writing Research. Hammill, D. (1987).
Assessing the abilities and instructional needs of
students. In D. D.
Hammill (Ed.), Assessing the abilities and instructional
needs of students: A practical guide for educators,
psychologists, speech pathologists, and diagnosticians
(pp. 5-37). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed
Lahey, M., & Bloom, L. (1994). Variability and language
learning disabilities. In G. P. Wallach & K. G. Butler
(Eds.), Language, learning disabilities in school-age
children and adolescents: Some principles and
applications (pp. 354-372). Needham Heights, MA:
Allyn & Bacon
Leitão, C., & Ribeiro, I. (2009). Escrita de textos no quarto
ano de escolaridade: Desenvolvimento e implementação
de um programa de intervenção. In Actas do X Congresso
Internacional Galego- Português de Psicopedagogia.
Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Fidalgo, R. (2014). Children's high
‐level writing skills: Development of planning and revising
and their contribution to writing quality. BritishJournal of
Educational Psychology, 84(2), 177-193.
Marques, C., Silva, I., & Ferreira, P. C. (2006).
NovaTerminologia Linguística para os Ensinos
Básico e Secundário: Roteiros para a ação
didática no Secundário. Porto: ASA.
Mateus, M. H. M., Pereira, D. & Fischer, G. (2008).
Diversidade Linguística na Escola Portuguesa.
Projecto do ILTEC – Instituto de Linguística
Teórica e Computacional. Edição da Fundação
Calouste Gulbenkian.
Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Fernández, M. J. (2014).
Iterative co-evaluation with a rubric of narrative
texts in Primary Education/Coevaluación iterativa
con rúbrica de textos narrativos en la Educación
Primaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 184-220.
doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881653
Nicole, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006).
Formative assessment and self-regulated learning:
model and seven principles of good feedback.
Studies in Higher Education, 34, 199-218.
Ortega, J. L. G. (2013). Cómo estructuran el contenido de
la escritura alumnos de educación primaria. Contextos
Educativos. Revista de Educación, (15), 9-26.
doi.org/10.18172/con.652
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring
rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited:
A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144.
Pereira, M.L.A. (2000). Escrever em Português Didácticas e
Práticas. Porto: Edições Asa.
Pinheiro, A. (2007). O Desenvolvimento da Capacidade de
Elaboração Escrita: Editorial Novembro
Pritchard, R. J., & Honeycutt, R. L. (2006). The process
approach to writinginstruction: Examining its
effectiveness. Handbook of writing research, 275-290.
Ramos, J. L., Cuadrado, I., & Iglesias, B. (2005). La
composición escrita en el alumnado de Educación
Primaria y Secundaria. Cultura y educación, 17(3),
-251.
Raven, J., & Raven, J. C. (1998). Jh Court. Manual for
Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales.
Section 2: The Coloured Progressive Matrices.
Redondo, R. F., Sánchez, J. N. G., Torrance, M., & Ramón,
P. R. (2009). Cómo enseñar composición escrita en el
aula: un modelo de instrucción cognitivo-estratégico y
autorregulado. Aula Abierta, 37(1), 105-116.
Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. E. (2003). Improving
students' learning by developing their understanding
of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147-164.
doi.org/10.1080/02602930301671
Silva, A. C. (2013). O impacto da revisão na qualidade de
composições de crianças do 4º ano de escolaridade.
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(1).
Sim-Sim, I. (1997). Avaliação da linguagem oral: Um
contributo para o conhecimento do descobrimento
linguístico das crianças portuguesas. Textos de
Educação. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing
children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading
and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing
Quarterly, 23, 7–25.
doi.org/10.1080/10573560600837578
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing
demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham,
& J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research
(pp. 67- 80). New York: Guilford Press
Torrance, M., & Jeffery, G. (1999). The cognitive demands
of writing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam
University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a
self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective.
Contemporary educational psychology, 22(1), 73-
doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self regulated
learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41, (2),64-
doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The papers published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors are the holders of the exploitation rights (copyright) of their work, but grant the right of first publication to the Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, which may publish in any language and format as well as publish and distribute their whole or partial content by any technologically available means and via data base.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate the articles accepted for publication on personal or institutional websites, before and after their publication, provided it is clearly stated that the work is in this journal and all bibliographic data are provided along with access to the document, preferably through the DOI (if it is indispensable to use a pdf, the final version formatted by the journal should be used). In the case of articles resulting from funded studies or projects, this will be done within the deadlines and terms established by the supporting organisation(s) of the published research.
