Robô Lego & Perturbações do Espetro do Autismo: Uma potencial parceria? || Lego Robots & Autism Spectrum Disorder: a potential partnership?
Barra lateral do artigo
Contido principal do artigo
Resumo
A perturbação do espectro do autismo (PEA) caracteriza-se por dificuldades no desenvolvimento de comportamentos sociais, na comunicação verbal ou gestual, e pela manifestação de atividades motoras repetitivas. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de melhorar as competências sociais e a transferência das competências de cinco crianças com PEA e deficiência mental associada usando um robô de baixo custo da Lego como um mediador. A metodologia proposta foi dividida em cinco fases: familiarização, pré-teste, prática, pós-teste e transferência de competências. O estudo foi realizado em dois períodos sequenciais em diferentes lugares. Em cada período foram definidas diferentes questões de investigação tendo em conta o grupo-alvo. Os resultados mostram que a atenção conjunta e a interação com o investigador aumentaram ao longo das sessões. Além disso, os resultados indicam que houve uma transferência efetiva de competências nos estudos de caso abordados. Isso reforça as conclusões que o robô da Lego pode ser uma ferramenta adequada a ser explorada com esta população-alvo. No entanto, é necessário um estudo mais detalhado e com uma amostra maior. A metodologia proposta pode ser usada por profissionais e pais como complemento às intervenções tradicionais.
Palavras-chave:
Downloads
Detalles do artigo
Referências
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., Text Revision). Arlington, VA: APA.
Billard, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Nadel, J. (2007). Building Robota, a Mini-Humanoid Robot for the Rehabilitation of Children with Autism. The RESNA Assistive Technology Journal, 19, 37-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131864
Bregman, J. D., Zager, D., & Gerdtz, J. (2005). Behavioural interventions. In Volkmar FR, Paul R, Klin A, Cohen D. (eds). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (897 –924). Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Brooks, R., Breazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati B., & Williamson, M. (1998). The Cog Project: Building a Humanoid Robot. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents (pp.52-87). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Campbell, J. M. (2003). Efficacy of behavioural interventions for reducing problem behaviour in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 120 –138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(03)00014-3
Conroy, M. A., Boyd, B. A., Asmus, J. M. & Madera, D. (2007). A functional approach for ameliorating social skills deficits in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Infants & Young Children, 20, 242-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000277755.93313.7d
Dautenhahn, K. (1999). Robots as Social Actors: AURORA and the Case of Autism. In Proceedings CT99, The Third International Cognitive Technology Conference (pp.359-374). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University
Davis, M., Otero, N., Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C.L., & Powell, S.D., (2007). Creating a software to promote understanding about narrative in children with autism: Reflecting on the design of feedback and opportunities to reason, development and learning. ICDL 2007. In IEEE, Proceedings in IEEE 6th International Conference (pp.64-69), Atlanta, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2007.4354045
Duquette, A., Michaud, F., & Mercier, H. (2008). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton Robot, 24, 147-157, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-007-9056-5
Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. (2009). Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Experimental Robotics, 54, 201–210.
François, D., Powell, S., & Dautenhahn, K. (2009). A long-term study of children with autism playing with a robotic pet: Taking inspirations from non-directive play therapy to encourage children's proactivity and initiative-taking. Interaction Studies, 10, 324–373.
Giullian, N.; Ricks, D.; Atherton, A.; Colton, M.; Goodrich, M.; & Brinton, B. (2010). Detailed requirements for robots in autism therapy, Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC) In Procs IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (pp.2595-2602). San Diego: IEEE, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5641908
Horner R. H., Carr E. G., Strain P. S., Todd A. W., & Reed H. K. (2002). Problem behaviour interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. J Autism Dev Disord, 32, 423 –446.
Iacono, I., Lehmann, H., Marti, P., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with autism: A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. In procs IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, (pp. 1-6). Frankfurt: IEEE
Kozima, H., Nakagawa, C., & Yasuda, Y. (2007). Children-robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. Progress in Brain Research, 164, 385-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)64021-7
Kozima, M., Michalowski, P., & Nakagawa, C. (2008). Keepon: A Playful Robot for Research, Therapy, and Entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0009-8
Lund, H., Pederson, M. D., & Beck, R. (2009). Modular robotic tiles: Experiments for children with autism. Artificial Life and Robotics, 13, 393–400.
Marans W. D., Rubin E., & Laurent A. (2005). Addressing social communication skills in individuals with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: critical priorities in educational programming. In Volkmar F. R, Paul R, Klin A, & Cohen D, (Eds). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (977 –1002). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Olley J. G. (2005), Curriculum and classroom structure. In Volkmar F. R, Paul R, Klin A, & Cohen D, (Eds). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (863 –881). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Paul R., & Sutherland D. (2005). Enhancing early language in children with autism spectrum disorders. In Volkmar F. R, Paul R, Klin A, Cohen D, (Eds.) Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (946 –976). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Robins, B., Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot-human interaction. Interaction Studies, 5(2), 161-198.
Robins, B., Otero, N., Ferrari, E. & Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Eliciting Requirements for a Robotic Toy for Children with Autism – Results from User Panels. In Procs 16th IEEE Int Symp on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN2007) (pp. 101-106). Jeju, Korea: IEEE, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415061
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dickerson, P. (2009). From Isolation to Communication: A Case Study Evaluation of Robot Assisted Play for Children with Autism with a Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot. 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Cancun, México, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACHI.2009.32
Rutherford, M. D., & McIntosh, D. N. (2007). Rules versus prototype matching: Strategies of perception of emotional facial expressions in the autism spectrum. Journal of autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 187-196, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0151-9
Salter, T., Werry, I., & Michaud, F. (2008). Going into the wild in child–robot interaction studies: issues in social robotic development. Intel Serv Robotics, 1, 93–108.
Schopler, E., Reichler, R., DeVellis, R., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 91-103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02408436
Stribling, P., Rae, J., & Dickerson, P. (2009). Using conversation analysis to explore the recurrence of a topic in the talk of a boy with autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 555–582.
Taylor B. A. (2001). Teaching peer social skills to children with autism. In Maurice C, Green G, Foxx RM (Eds.), Making a Difference: Behavioural Intervention for Autism (83–96). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wainer, J., Ferrari, E., Dautenhahn, K., & Robins, B. (2010). The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 445–455.
Warren, Z. E., Bekele E., Weitlauf, A. F, Zheng, Z., Zhang, L., Sarkar, N., Swanson, & et al. (2013). Can Robotic Interaction Improve Joint Attention Skills? J. Autism Dev Disorders, 45, 3726-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1918-4