Adaptation of the Scale Knowledge Perception Scale in Primary Education

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.2778

Palabras clave:

perceção, conhecimento de escrita, ensino primário, escalas, validação.

Resumen

Esta investigação pretendeu colmatar a necessidade de desenvolver escalas de avaliação das perceções dos alunos quanto ao seu conhecimento de escrita, especialmente no ensino primário. Assim, validou-se a Escala de Perceção do Conhecimento de Escrita em Portugal, após tradução e adaptação de uma escala americana, junto de 338 alunos do 4.º ano de escolaridade, selecionados aleatoriamente. Os resultados explicam 38.5 % da variância dos dados. A escala final apresentou uma estrutura diferenciada composta por dois fatores: “Produzir conteúdo” e “Planificar” e 12 itens. O Alpha total da escala foi de .776 e reúne os critérios de fiabilidade exigidos. 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Catarina Liane Teixeira de Castro Araújo, University of Minho

Catarina Liane Araujo is currently finishing her PhD in the area of Childhood Studies, with a special emphasis on Special Education Needs at the University of Minho in Braga, Portugal. She is developing a model of intervention is which we will use SRSD (Pow+Tree) within information and communication technologies (ICT) contexts, by compiling various theories and concepts scientifically tested to be effective when we want to improve the quality of writing in students with LD, as well as other students who are in the classroom (e.g. TPACK, UDL). She has focused on the area of writing, learning disabilities, Self-Regulated Strategy Development and the use of ICT in primary education. This work was conducted at Educational Research Centre, University of Minho, and financed by Technology and Science Foundation (FCT), Portugal, from a PhD Grant SFRH/BD/86175/2012.
She has participated in national and international projects such as: “Network - The voice of European Teachers-Comenius Network” (funded with support from the European Commission); “The Pigafetta Project – An investigation project about the educational use of the Magalhães Laptop in the 1st cycle of primary education in the North of Portugal” (funded with support from the Ministry of Education) and The Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Multilingualism on Children’s Cognitive Development (Partnership between University of Minho (Portugal) and University of Luxembourg).

Citas

Almeida, L. S. & Freire, T. (2010). Metodologia da investigação em psicologia e educação. Braga: Psiquilíbrios.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted Impact of Self- Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206-1222.

Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38. DOI: 10.1037/a0029692

Bruning, R. & Horn, C. (2000). Developing Motivation to Write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25-37.

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1990). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. Nova Iorque: Routledge.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theoryand Applications. American Psychological Association, 78(1), 98-104.

Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Cruz, V. (2007). Uma Abordagem Cognitiva da Leitura. Lisboa: Lidel.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods, 3, 272-299.

Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Graham, S. (2014). The Use of Multiple Forms of Assessment in the Service of Writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(2), 96-100. DOI: 10.1080/19388071.2014.868249.

Graham, S., Berninger, V. & Fan, W. (2007). The Structural Relationship between Writing Attitude and Writing Achievement in First and Third Grade Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 516-536.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. (2005). Writing Better: Effective Strategies for Teaching Students with Learning Difficulties. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R. & MacArthur, C. (2006). Explicitly Teaching Struggling Writers: Strategies for Mastering the Writing Process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(5), 290-294

Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A. & Fitzgerald, J. (2007a). Best Practices in Writing Instruction. Nova Iorque: The Guilford Press.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (2009). Almost 30 Years of Writing Research: Making Sense of It All with "The Wrath of Khan". Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 58-68.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R. & McKeown, D. (2013). The writing of students with LD and a meta-analysis of SRSD writing intervention studies: Redux. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (405-438). new York: Guilford Press.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research- based writing practices and the common core Meta-analysis and Meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498-522. doi:10.1086/681964.

Graham, S., Kiukara, MHarris & Fishman. (unplublished work). Approach to Writing, Attitudes and Self-efficacy in Wiriting.

Hayes, J. & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106-1113.

Harris, K. R., Lane, K., Graham, S., Driscoll, S., Sandmel, K., Brindle, M. & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Practice-based professional development for strategies instruction in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 103–119.

Harris, K. R. & Graham, S. (2013). "An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun": Learning to write and students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 63(1), 65-79. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-011-0057-x.

Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T. & Graham, S. (2008). Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing: Going beyond NLEs to a More Balanced Approach. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36(5-6), 395-408.

Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group.

Hogarty, K. Y., Hynes, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M. & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: the influence of sample size, communality and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202–226.

Hutcheson, G. D. & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The Multivariate Social Scientist: an introduction to generalized linear models. Londres: Sage Publications.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.

Lavale, E., Smith, J. & O´Ryan, L. (2002). The writing approaches of secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 399-418.

MacArthur, C. A. & Philippakos, Z. (2010). Instruction in a Strategy for Compare-Contrast Writing. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 438-456.

MacArthur, C. A., Philippakos, Z. A. & Graham, S. (2016). A Multicomponent Measure of Writing Motivation With Basic College Writers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(1), 31-43. DOI: 10.1177/0731948715583115

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. Nova Iorque: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Pestana, M. H. & Gageiro, J. N. (2008). Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.

Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. Nova Iorque: Jonh Wiley and Sons.

Vue, G., Hall, T. E., Robinson, K., Ganley, P., Elizalde, E. & Graham, S. (2015). Informing Understanding of Young Students’ Writing Challenges and Opportunities: Insights from the Development of a Digital Writing Tool That Supports Students With Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(2), 83-94. DOI: 10.1177/0731948715604571.

Wasserman, J. D. & Bracken, B. A. (2003). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 43-66). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices. The Counsel Psychol, 34(6), 806-838.

Descargas

Publicado

15-12-2017

Cómo citar

Teixeira de Castro Araújo, C. L., Martins, A. P., Osório, A. J., & Faria, C. (2017). Adaptation of the Scale Knowledge Perception Scale in Primary Education. Revista De Estudios E Investigación En Psicología Y Educación, (01), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.2778

Número

Vol. Extr., núm. 01 (2017) - XIV CIG-PP

Sección

XIV Congreso de Psicopedagogía. Área 1: APRENDIZAJE, MEMORIA Y MOTIVACIÓN

Licencia

Los trabajos publicados en esta revista están bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.

Licencia de Creative Commons

Los/as autores/as son los titulares de los derechos de explotación (copyright) de su trabajo, pero ceden el derecho de la primera publicación a la Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, la cual podrá publicar en cualquier lengua y soporte, divulgar y distribuir su contenido total o parcial por todos los medios tecnológicamente disponibles y a través de repositorios.

Se permite y anima a los/as autores/as a difundir los artículos aceptados para su publicación en los sitios web personales o institucionales, antes y después de su publicación, siempre que se indique claramente que el trabajo está en esta revista y se proporcionen los datos bibliográficos completos junto con el acceso al documento, preferiblemente mediante el DOI (en caso de que sea imprescindible utilizar un pdf, debe emplearse la versión final maquetada por la Revista). En el caso de artículos que provengan de estudios o proyectos financiados, esto se hará en los plazos y términos establecidos por la entidad o entidades financiadoras de la investigación publicada.