Main Article Content

Viviane Gomes Silva
Universidade do Minho
Portugal
Biography
Maria João Gomes
Portugal
Ranniery Mazzilly Souza
Portugal
Vol. Extr., núm. 13 (2017) - XIV CIG-PP, XIV Congreso Psicopedagogía. Área 13: TECNOLOGÍAS Y COMUNICACIÓN EDUCATIVA, pages 284-288
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.13.2957
Submitted: Sep 5, 2017 Accepted: Dec 14, 2017 Published: Dec 17, 2017
How to Cite

Abstract

Este artigo analisou os conceitos – “Desenho Universal para Aprendizagem”; “Acessibilidade na Web”; “Usabilidade no e-learning”; e “Usabilidade Pedagógica” – com o objetivo de identificar a articulação destes conceitos no contexto do Ensino a Distância (EaD) notadamente no e-learning destinadas ao aperfeiçoamento de Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem. Para lograr este intento utilizou-se a metodologia de revisão sistemática da literatura fundamentada em Tranfield, et. al (2002). A pesquisa usou como lócus as bases científicas: Scopus, Web of Science e Google Scholar, no intervalo de 2012 a 2017. Nas pesquisas identificaram-se inicialmente 96 artigos em que foram selecionados, após uma análise preliminar, 14 artigos cujo conteúdo constituiu o corpus de suporte a este texto.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Carletto, A. C., & Cambiaghi, S. (2008). Desenho Universal: Um conceito para todos. São Paulo: Instituto Mara Gabrilli. Recuperado de http://www.vereadoramaragabrilli.com.br/files/universal_web.pdf

CAST. (2011). National Center on Universal Design for Learning. Recuperado 3 de setembro de 2017, de http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/principle3

CAST. (2013). About Universal Design for Learning. Recuperado 27 de junho de 2017, de http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl

Çelik, S. (2012). Development of usability criteria for e-learning content development software. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 336–345. Recuperado de dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000102327

Erkilic, M., & Durak, S. (2013). Tolerable and inclusive learning spaces: an evaluation of policies and specifications for physical environments that promote inclusion in Turkish Primary Schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(5), 462–479. http://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.685333

Gomes, M. J. (2005). E-Learning: Reflexões em Torno do Conceito. Paulo Dias e Varela de Freitas (orgs.). Atas da IV Conferência Internacional de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação na Educação - Challenges’05, 229–236. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Green, L. S., Inan, F. A., & Denton, B. (2012). Examination of factors impacting student satisfaction with a new learning management system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 189–197. Recuperado de dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000102346/0

Hollins, N., & Foley, A. R. (2013). The experiences of students with learning disabilities in a higher education virtual campus. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 607–624. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9302-9

Katsanos, C., Tselios, N., Tsakoumis, A., & Avouris, N. (2012). Learning about web accessibility: A project based tool-mediated approach. Education and Information Technologies, 17(1), 79–94. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9145-5

Linder, K. E., Fontaine-Rainen, D. L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US Institutions of Higher Education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 21–34.

NCES. (2014). U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Educational Statistics. Recuperado 29 de agosto de 2017, de https://nces.ed.gov

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic Press. Recuperado de http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=529793

Open University. (2015). Open University United Kingdom. Recuperado 17 de dezembro de 2015, de http://www.open.ac.uk/about/main/strategy/facts-and-figures

Orfanou, K., Tselios, N., & Katsanos, C. (2015). Perceived Usability Evaluation of Learning Management Systems: Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 227–246.

OU. (2010). Equality Act. Recuperado 27 de junho de 2017, de http://www.open.ac.uk/equality-diversity/content/equality-law-1

SEMESP, S. das M. de E. S. (2016). Mapa do Ensino Superior no Brasil. Recuperado de http://convergenciacom.net/pdf/mapa-ensino-superior-brasil-2015.pdf

Silius, K.; Tervakari, A. (2003). The Usefulness of Web-based Learning Environments: The evaluation Tool into the Portal of Finnish Virtual University. International Conference on Network Universities and E- learning, Valencia.

Silva, V. G. da, Hilário, A. C. J. S., Souza, R. M. S. de, & Gomes, M. J. (2017). Um Comparativo de Métodos de Usabilidade Pedagógica em Ambientes Virtuais de Aprendizagem. In Challenges 2017: Aprender nas Nuvens - Learning in the Clouds (p. 1865–1883). Braga. Recuperado de https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/46035/1/Chalenges_2017_VS-MJG.pdf

Slater, R., Pearson, V. K., Warren, J. P., & Forbes, T. (2015). Institutional change for improving accessibility in the design and delivery of distance learning – the role of faculty accessibility specialists at The Open University. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(1), 6–20. http://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1013528

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2002). Developing an evidence-based approach to management knowledge using systematic review. Advanced Management Research Centre: Crafield School of Management, 44(1234), 28.

UNESCO. (1990). World declaration on education for all and framework for action to meet basic learning needs. Paris. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001275/127583e.pdf

W3C. (2016). World Wide Web Consortium. Recuperado 29 de junho de 2017, de http://www.w3.org

WCAG. (2008). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Recuperado 28 de setembro de 2016, de http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20