Searching for predictors of the risk decision-making process in social situations in the adolescence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2015.2.2.1328Keywords:
Balloon Analogue Risk Task, risk decision-making, adolescence, social situationsAbstract
This study examined how well self-reported sensation seeking, empathy and resistance to peer influence, and performance on the computer-based measure to evaluate risk-taking behavior (Balloon Analogue Risk Task, BART) predicted the risk decision-making process on the computer-based Social Context Decision Task (SCDT). Participants were 256 early, mid- and late adolescents and young adults, distributed by age and gender. Early adolescents scored lower on sensation seeking and empathy than late adolescents and young adults. Men scored higher on sensation seeking whereas women scored higher on empathy and resistance to peer influence. Regression models showed that riskiness on the BART was positively related to the percentage of risk elections and shorter decision times in the SCDT task, with the BART parameters accounting for variance in these measures beyond that accounted for by age, gender and Disinhibition. These results contributed to a more comprehensive multimethod assessment of the process of risk decision making in social situations.
Downloads
References
Aklin, W.M., Lejuez, C.W., Zvolensky, M.J., Kahler, C.W., & Gwadz, M. (2005). Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 215-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007
Bjork, J. M., & Pardini, D. A. (2014). Who are those “risk-taking adolescents”? Individual differences in developmental neuroimaging research. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 11, 55-64.
Blakemore, S. J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 47(3‐4), 296-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x
Blakemore, S. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2012). Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1184–1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3177
Bohlin, M. C., & Erlandsson, S. I. (2007). Risk behavior and noise exposure among adolescents. Noise & Health, 9, 55-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741. 36981
Bornovalova, M., Daughters, S., Hernandez, G., Richards, J., & Lejuez, C. (2005). Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 13(4), 311-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.13.4.311
Boyer, T. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26(3), 291-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.05.002
Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 2, 363-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780471726746.ch12
Byrnes, J., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
Choudhury, S., Charman, T., Bird, V., & Blakemore, S. J. (2007). Development of action representation during adolescence. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 255-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.010
Crone, E. A., Bullens, L., Van der Plas, E. A. A., Kijkuit, E. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence. Development and psychopathol-ogy, 20(04), 1213-1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000588
Davis, M.H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85, 1-17. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark_Davis18/publication/34891073_Individual_differences_in_empathy__a_multidimensional_approach_/links/0046352dee2296ea54000000.pdf
Finer, L.B., & Henshaw, S.K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 90-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1363/3809006
Geier, C., & Luna, B. (2009). The maturation of incentive processing and cognitive control. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 93, 212–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.021
Krain, A.L., Wilson, A.M., Arbuckle, R., Castellanos, F.X., Milham, M.P. (2006). Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: a metaanalysis of decision making. Neuroimage, 32, 477–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.047
Ladouceur, R., Bouchard, C., Rheaume, N., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., Leblond, J., & Walker, M. (2000). Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults? Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009443516329
Lejuez, C., Aklin, W., Bornovalova, M., & Moolchan, E. (2005). Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7(1), 71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14622200412331328484
Lejuez, C.W., Aklin, W., Daughters, S., Zvolensky, M., Kahler, C., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and validity of the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART-Y) in the assessment of risk-taking behavior among inner-city adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36, 106-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410709336573
Lejuez C.W., Aklin, W.M., Jones, H.A., Richards, J.B., Strong, D.R., Kahler, C.W., Read, J.P. (2003). The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
Lejuez, C.W., Read, J.P., Kahler, C.W., Richards, J.B., Ramsey, S.E., Stuart, G.L., Strong, D.R., & Brown, R.A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017417
Pérez-Albéniz, A., De Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación de interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) al español.Psicothema, 15(2), 267-272. http://www.unioviedo.es/reunido/index.php/PST/article/viewFile/8118/7982
Perez, J., & Torrubia, R. (1986). Fiabilidad y validez de la version española de la Escala de Búsqueda de Sensaciones (forma V). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 18, 7–22. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80518101.pdf
Pleskac, T., Wallsten, T., Wang, P., & Lejuez, C. (2008). Development of an automatic response mode to improve the clinical utility of sequential risk-taking tasks. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(6), 555-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014245
Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 256-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00067-9
Rodrigo, M. J., Padrón, I., de Vega, M. & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). Adolescents’ risky decision-making activates neural networks related to social cognition and cognitive control processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8:60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00060
Romer, D. (2010). Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: Implications for prevention. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 263-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.20442
Romer, D., & Hennessy, M. (2007). A biosocial-affect model of adolescent sensation seeking: The role of affect evaluation and peer-group influence in adolescent drug use. Prevention Science, 8(2), 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0064-7
Schiebener, J., García-Arias, M., García-Villamisar, D., Cabanyes-Truffino, J., & Brand, M. (2014). Developmental changes in decision making under risk: The role of executive functions and reasoning abilities in 8-to 19-year-old decision makers. Child Neuropsychology, (ahead-of-print), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2014.934216
Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J.L. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual-systems model. Developmental Psychology, vol. 44, 1764-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012955
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental psychology, 43(6), 1531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Van Leijenhorst, L., Westenberg, P.M. & Crone, E.A. (2008). A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 179–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565640701884287
Windle, M., Spear, L., Fuligni, A., Angold, A., Brown, J., Pine, D., et al. (2008). Transitions into underage and problem drinking: Developmental processes and mechanisms between 10 and 15 years of age. Pediatrics, 121(Suppl4), S273-S289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2243c
Youth Risk Behavior Survey. (2013). Vermont Department of Health, USA. Available at: http://healthvermont.gov/research/yrbs/2013/documents/2013_yrbs_full_report.pdf (accessed January 4, 2015).
Zuckerman, M (1994). Biological expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge univ. Press, Nueva York.
Zuckerman, M.; Eysenck, S.B.G. & Eysenck, H.J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The papers published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors are the holders of the exploitation rights (copyright) of their work, but grant the right of first publication to the Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, which may publish in any language and format as well as publish and distribute their whole or partial content by any technologically available means and via data base.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate the articles accepted for publication on personal or institutional websites, before and after their publication, provided it is clearly stated that the work is in this journal and all bibliographic data are provided along with access to the document, preferably through the DOI (if it is indispensable to use a pdf, the final version formatted by the journal should be used). In the case of articles resulting from funded studies or projects, this will be done within the deadlines and terms established by the supporting organisation(s) of the published research.
