Main Article Content

José Arizmendi
Universidade do Minho
Portugal
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-9755
Ana Almeida
Universidade do Minho
Portugal
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-312X
Vol. Extr., núm. 05 (2017) - XIV CIG-PP, XIV Congreso Psicopedagogía. Área 5: FAMILIA, ESCUELA Y COMUNIDAD, pages 096-101
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.05.2371
Submitted: Jul 14, 2017 Accepted: Dec 12, 2017 Published: Dec 15, 2017
How to Cite

Abstract

Em Portugal, 2703 crianças em acolhimento perspetivam regressar para a família biológica. A investigação combina as perspetivas de crianças, pais e profissionais sobre reunificação familiar, identificando necessidades, comportamentos, procedimentos e atitudes. A amostra foi composta por 45 participantes, distribuídos em 6 grupos focais e 8 entrevistas semiestruturadas. Os resultados revelam que os sentimentos vivenciados pelas famílias durante o processo, a consciência dos problemas e da medida afetam a colaboração com os profissionais. Em complementaridade, os resultados apontam para a necessidade de intervenções socioeducativas durante o processo e de suporte específico após a saída do acolhimento.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Amorós, P., & Palacios, J. (2004). Acogimiento familiar. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Balsells, M. À., Pastor, C., Amorós, P., Mateos, A., Ponce, C., & Navajas, A. (2014). Child Welfare and Successful Reunification through the Socio-Educative Process: Training Needs among Biological Families in Spain. Social Sciences, 3(4), 809–826. http://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3040809

Balsells, M. À., Pastor, C., Mateos, A., Vaquero, E., & Urrea, A. (2015). Exploring the needs of parents for achieving reunification: The views of foster children, birth family and social workers in Spain. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 159–166. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.016

Balsells, M. À., Pastor, C., Molina, M. C., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Vaquero, E., & Mundet, A. (2013). Child welfare and successful reunification: Understanding of the family difficulties during the socio-educative process. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 42, 228–247.

Biehal, N. (2007). Reuniting children with their families: Reconsidering the evidence on timing, contact and outcomes. British Journal of Social Work, 37(5), 807–823. http://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl051

Biehal, N., Sinclair, I., & Wade, J. (2015). Reunifying abused or neglected children: Decision-making and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 107–118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.014

Carnochan, S., Lee, C., & Austin, M. J. (2013). Achieving Timely Reunification: Performance Pointers. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(3), 179–195. http://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.788948

Del Valle, J. F., & Zurita, J. F. (2007). El acogimiento residencial en la protección a la infancia (3.a ed.). Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.

Department of Health. (2000). Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. London: The Stationery Office.

Déprez, A., & Wendland, J. (2015). La visite parentale chez l’enfant placé, une revue de la littérature. Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 173(6), 494–498. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2013.07.009

Gobierno de Cantabria. (2008). Manual Cantabria vol 5. Modelo de Intervención en Acogimiento Residencial. Santander: Dirección General de Políticas Sociales.

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. http://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664

Instituto da Segurança Social, I. P. (2016). CASA 2015 - Relatório da Caracterização Anual de Situação de Acolhimento das Crianças e Jovens. Lisbon: Instituto da Segurança Social, I.P.

Knorth, E. J., Knot-dickscheit, J., & Thoburn, J. (2016). Supporting children when providing services to families experiencing multiple problems. International JournaI of Child and Family Welfare, 1(March), 2–10.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x

Leathers, S. J. (2002). Parental visiting and family reunification: Could inclusive practice make a difference? Child Welfare, 81(4), 595–616.

León, E., & Palacios, J. (2004). Las visitas de los padres y la reunificación familiar tras el acogimiento. Portularia, 4, 241–248.

Léveillé, S., & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(7), 929–944. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.009

Lietz, C. A. (2006). Uncovering Stories of Family Resilience: A Mixed Methods Study of Resilient Families, Part 1. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87(4), 575–582. http://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3573

Lietz, C. A. (2007). Uncovering Stories of Family Resilience: A Mixed Methods Study of Resilient Families, Part 2. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(1), 147–155. http://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3602

Lietz, C. A., Lacasse, J. R., & Cacciatore, J. (2011). Social Support in Family Reunification : A Qualitative Study. Journal of Family Social Work, 14(1), 3.20. http://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2011.531454

Lietz, C. A., & Strength, M. (2009). Stories of Successful Reunification : A Narrative Study of Family Resilience in Child Welfare. http://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4102

López, M., Del Valle, J. F., Montserrat, C., & Bravo Arteaga, A. (2013). Factors associated with family reunification for children in foster care. Child and Family Social Work, 18(2), 226–236. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00847.x

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development, 71(3), 543–562. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164

Martín, J. C., Almeida, A. M. T., Cabrera, E., Miranda, C., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2014). La evaluación de riesgos y fortalezas en Parentalidad Positiva. Em M. J. Rodrigo, M. L. Máiquez, J. C. Martín, S. Byrne, & B. Rodríguez (Eds.), Manual práctico de parentalidad positiva (pp. 45–65). Editorial Síntesis.

Rodrigo, M. J., Camacho, J., Máiquez, M. L., Byrne, S., & Benito, J. M. (2009). Factores que influyen en el pronóstico de recuperación de las familias en riesgo psicosocial. Psicothema, 21(1), 90–96.

Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., & Martín, J. C. (2005). Buenas Prácticas profesionales para el apoyo a la parentalidad positiva. Madrid: FEMP.

Sen, R. (2010). Managing contact in Scotland for children in non-permanent out-of-home placement. Child Abuse Review, 19(6), 423–437. http://doi.org/10.1002/car.1139

Sen, R., & Broadhurst, K. (2011). Contact between children in out-of-home placements and their family and friends networks: a research review. Child and Family Social Work, 16(3), 298–309. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00741.x

Terling, T. (1999). The efficacy of family reunification practices: Reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children reunited with their families. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(12), 1359–1370. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00103-9

Ubbesen, M. B., Petersen, L., Mortensen, P. B., & Kristensen, O. S. (2012). Out of care and into care again. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2147–2155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.014

Walsh, F. (1996). Family resilience: A concept and its application. Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35, 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1996.00261.x

Wulczyn, F. (2004). Family reunification. Children, Families, and Foster Care, 14(1), 94–113.