Teachting writing strategies to compose the persuasive text

Article Sidebar

PDF (Português)
Published: Oct 26, 2015

Main Article Content

Maria Prata
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciencias da Educacao da Universidade de Coimbra
Portugal
Isabel Festas
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciencias da Educacao da Universidade de Coimbra
Portugal
Albertina Oliveira
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciencias da Educacao da Universidade de Coimbra
Portugal
Sara Ferreira
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciencias da Educacao da Universidade de Coimbra
Portugal
Helena Damião
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciencias da Educacao da Universidade de Coimbra
Portugal
Vol. Extr., núm. 01 (2015) - XIII CIG-PP, XIII Congreso Internacional G-P de Psicopedagogía. Área 1: APRENDIZAJE, MEMORIA Y MOTIVACIÓN, pages 164-168
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2015.0.01.924
Submitted: Jul 5, 2015 Accepted: Aug 7, 2015 Published: Oct 26, 2015
How to Cite

Abstract

The present investigation tested the effectiveness of two methods of teaching strategies to 9th grader for persuasive writing. After the first part, common to both groups, which focused on Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD), the 121 students of the EG performed the planning tasks of the persuasive text in the collaborative context of the jigsaw; meanwhile the 109 students of the CG worked individually. In this article beyond the theoretical supports of the research, the method will be described with particular emphasis on the materials, instruments and procedures.

Keywords:

persuasive text, Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD), jigsaw, explicit instuction, planning strategies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Referências

Adam, J.M. (2011). Les textes. Types et prototypes. Paris: Armand Colin Éditeur.

Albuquerque, C. (2002). A composição escrita nas dificuldades de aprendizagem. Psychologica, 2002, 30, 79-94.

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Carvalho, J. A. B. & Pimenta, J. (2005). Escrever para aprender, escrever para expimir o aprendido. Instituto de Educação e Psicologia. Universidade do Minho. jabrandao@iep.uminho.pt; jpimenta@iep.uminho.pt.

Crammond, J. G. (1998). The Uses and Complexity of Argument Structures in Expert and Student Persuasive Writing. Written Communication, 15 (2), pp. 230-268. DOI: 10.1177/0741088398015002004 1998. (http://wcx.sagepub.com/content/15/2/230).

Crowhurst, M. (1990). Teaching and Learning the Writing of Persuasive/Argumentative Discourse. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 348-359. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1495109.

Duarte, I. M. (2008). Ensino da língua portuguesa em Portugal: o texto, no cruzamento dos estudos linguísticos e literários. En Língua Portuguesa: educação & mudança. (pp. 210-232). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Europa.

Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 122-128. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/356095.

Felton M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32 (2&3), 135-153.

Festas, M. I.F. (2002). Principais tendências no ensino da escrita de textos. Psychologica, 2002, 30, 173-185.

GAVE (2010). Relatório - Um Olhar Sobre os Resultados dos Exames Nacionais. Setembro de 2010.

GAVE (2011). Exames Nacionais. Relatório 2010. Junho de 2011.

GAVE (2012). Exames Nacionais. Relatório 2011. Julho de 2012.

GAVE (2013). Provas Finais de Ciclo e Exames Finais Nacionais 2012. Julho de 2013.

Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26 (1), 1-15.

Harris K., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Harris, K., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

Kellog, R. (1994). The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, INC.

Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogical argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545-552. doi: 10.1177/0956797611402512.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(2), 90-104.

Newell, G. E., R., Beach, Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46 (3), 273-304.

Olinghouse, N.G., Santangelo, T. & Wilson, J. (2012). Examining the Validity of Single-Occasion, Single-Genre, Holistically Scored Writing Assessments. En E. Van Steendam, M. Tillema, G. Rijlaarsdam et H. Van den Bergh (Ed.), Measuring Writing: Recent Insights into Theory, Methodology and Practises (pp. 55-82). Leiden: Brill.

Silva, P. N. da (2012). Tipologias textuais. Como classificar textos e sequências. Coimbra: Edições Almedina, S.A.

Sousa, C., Inácio, M., Ferreira, S., Prata, M., Festas, M., & Oliveira, A. (2012). O modelo Self-Regulated Strategy Development no ensino da escrita do ensaio de opinião. In Actas do 12º Colóquio Internacional de Psicologia e Educação. Lisboa: ISPA, ISBN: 978-989-8384-15-7. (pp.1284-1295).

Weigle, S. C. & Montee , M. (2012). Rater’s Perceptions of textual Borrowing in Integrated Writings Tasks. En E. Van Steendam, M. Tillema, G. Rijlaarsdam et H. Van den Bergh (Ed.), Measuring Writing: Recent Insights into Theory, Methodology and Practises (pp. 117-145). Leiden: Brill.