Main Article Content

Ana Paula Pereira
University of Minho
Portugal
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-7602
Biography
Bárbara Ribeiro
University of Minho
Portugal
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3170-2477
Biography
Noelia Sánchez
University of Murcia
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-9291
Biography
Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026), Articles, pages Article e12415

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2026.13.1.12415
Submitted: 2025-07-03 Published: 2026-04-09
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

This study examines the perspectives of Portuguese Early Intervention (EI) professionals regarding the child assessment process, focusing on its planning, implementation, and the sharing of results. A qualitative design was employed, involving eight EI professionals selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis. Findings highlight the central role of families throughout the assessment process, particularly in identifying concerns, resources, and priorities from the initial stages. Assessment practices are predominantly conducted by transdisciplinary teams in children’s natural contexts, combining standardized tools with functional and routine-based approaches. The sharing of results typically occurs in two stages: an initial collaborative discussion with the family and the subsequent delivery of a functional report. Collaboration with educators and other professionals also emerges as a key element. Participants identified strengths related to family-centered practices, teamwork, and the ecological and individualized nature of assessment. However, significant constraints were reported, particularly limited human resources, time restrictions, and organizational demands. Recommendations include strengthening professional training and implementing more flexible policies to facilitate family involvement. These findings contribute to a better understanding of current EI assessment practices in Portugal and support the development of more integrated, ecological, and family-centered approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

BAGNATO, Stephen J. (2007). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention: Best practices. (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

BAGNATO, Stephen J.; GOINS, Deborah D.; PRETTI-FRONTCZAK, Kristie; & NEISWORTH, John T. (2014). Authentic assessment as best practice for early childhood intervention: National consumer social va¬lidity research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414523652

BAGNATO, Stephen J.; MACY, Marisa; DIONNE, Carmen; SMITH, Nora; BROCK, Robinson J.; LARSON, Tracy; LONDONO, Maria., FEVOLA, A.; BRUDER, M B.; & CRANMER, Jamie (2024). Authentic assessment for early childhood intervention: In-vivo & virtual practices for interdisciplinary professionals. Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology and Education, 8(1), 41-72. https://doi.org/10.58948/2834-8257.1066

BARDIN, Laurence (2018). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

BOAVIDA, Tânia; AGUIAR, Cecília; & MCWILLIAM, Robin (2013). A Training program to improve IFSP/IEP goals and objectives through the routines-based Interview. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(4), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121413494416

COUTINHO, Clara (2011). Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas: Teoria e prática. Almedina.

CRESWELL, John; & GUETTERMAN, Timothy (2024). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson.

DECRETO-LEI 281/2009. Cria o Sistema Nacional de Intervenção Precoce na Infância. Diário da República 1193, de 06 de outubro de 2009. https://data.dre.pt/eli/dec-lei/281/2009/10/06/p/dre/pt/html

DIVISION FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD (2014). DEC Recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/dec-recommended-practices

DUNST, Carl J. (2015). Improving the design and implementation of in-service professional development in early childhood intervention. Infants & Young Children 28(3), 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000042

DUNST, Carl J. (2020). Modeling the relationships between parent strengths, parenting efficacy beliefs, and child social-affective behavior: Shared activities and child well-being. International Journal of Child Development and Mental Health 8(2), 11-18. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cdmh/article/view/232866

DUNST, Carl J.; & BRUDER, Mary B. (2014). Preservice professional preparation and teachers’ self-efficacy appraisals of natural environment and inclusion practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413505873

DUNST, Carl J.; BRUDER, Mary B.; & ESPE-SHERWINDT, Marilyn (2014). Family capacity-building in early childhood intervention: Do context and setting matter? School Community Journal, 24(1), 37-48.

DUNST, Carl J.; ESPE-SHERWINDT, Mary; & HAMBY, Deborah W. (2019). Does capacity-building professional development engender practitioners’ use of capacity-building family-centered practices? European Journal of Educational Research 8(2), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.513

KEILTY, Bonnie (2020). Assessing the home environment to promote infant-toddler learning within everyday family routines. Young Exceptional Children, 23(4), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250619864076

KEILTY, Bonnie ; TRIVETTE, Carol M. ; & GILLESPIE, Jennifer (2022). Parent agency in promoting child learning: Family perceptions of focusing on family strengths during early childhood assessment and planning practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 20(3), 397-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221083420

LARANJEIRA, Rita; & SERRANO, Ana M. (2017). Perceção de profissionais e de pais acerca do Ages & Stages Questionnaires (ASQ-PT). Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 11, 179-183. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.11.2735

LEE, Deborah D.; BAGNATO, Stephen J.; & PRETTI-FRONTCZAK, Kristie (2016). Utility & validity of authentic assess¬ments & conventional tests for international early childhood intervention purposes: Evidence from U.S. national social validity research. Journal of Intellectual Disability: Diagnosis & Treatment, 3(4), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.2

LEMIRE, Colombe; POITRAS, Maxime; & DIONNE, Carmen (2019). Évaluation authentique en intervention précoce et importance de la complémentarité entre l’évaluation fonctionnelle et normative en psychoeducation. Revue de Psychoéducation, 48(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.7202/1060007ar

MACY, Marisa; & BAGNATO, Stephen J. (2024). Wishful LINKing: Authentic environmental measures aligned with programmatic purposes. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52, 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01424-0

MACY, Marisa; BAGNATO, Stephen J.; & GALLEN, Robert (2016). Authentic assessment: A venerable idea whose time is now. Zero to Three, 37(1), 37-43.

MACY, Marisa; BAGNATO, Stephen J.; & WEISZHAUPT, Krisztina (2019). Family-friendly communication via authentic assessment for early childhood intervention programs. Zero to Three, 40(2), 45-51. https://www.zerotothree.org/resource/journal/family-friendly-communication-via-authentic-assessment-for-early-childhood-intervention-programs/

MAS, Joana M.; DUNST, Carl J.; HAMBY, Deborah W.; BALCELLS-BALCELLS, Anna; GARCÍA-VENTURA, Simón; BAQUÉS, Natasha; & GINÉ, Climent (2020). Relationships between family-centred practices and parent involvement in early childhood intervention. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 37(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1823165

MAGALHÃES, Sandra F.; & PEREIRA, Ana P. S. (2013). A avaliação do desenvolvimento em intervenção precoce: Perceções das famílias portuguesas. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 21(1), 149-163. https://hdl.handle.net/2183/12611

MCWILLIAM, Robin (2012). Avaliar as necessidades das famílias através de uma entrevista baseada nas rotinas. In R. McWilliam (Ed.), Trabalhar com as famílias de crianças com necessidades especiais (pp. 38-72). Porto Editora.

MORALES-MURILLO, Catalina P.; GARCÍA-GRAU, Pau; MCWILLIAM, Robin; & GRAU, Maria D. (2021). Rasch analysis of authentic evaluation of young children's functioning in classroom routines. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 615489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615489

PEREIRA, Ana P. S.; PEROSA, Andrea; & REIS, Helena I. (2020). A complementaridade de pais e de profissionais na avaliação em Intervenção precoce. Educação, 43(1), Article e35318. https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2020.1.35318

PEREIRA, Ana P. S.; & OLIVEIRA, Sandra C. (2017). The benefits and difficulties in the elaboration and implementation of individual intervention plan in early intervention: The perspectives of Portuguese professionals. Early Child Development and Care, 189(6), 965-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1359581

PEREIRA, Ana P. S.; & SERRANO, Ana M. (2014). Early intervention in Portugal: Study of professionals’ perceptions. Journal of Family Social Work, 17(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2013.865426

PINTO, Marta; & SERRANO, Ana M. (2017). Caracterização da participação das famílias no apoio pelas equipas locais de intervenção. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, (11), 217-220. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.11.2798