Main Article Content

D. E. Martínez
Universidad Nacional de La Matanza
Argentina
Vol. 01 No. 014 (2015), Articles (open section), pages 103-127
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/redma.2015.01.014.4883
Submitted: Dec 4, 2018 Accepted: Dec 4, 2018
How to Cite

Abstract

This article has been made on the basis of the research carried out in the framework of my PhD studies in Economic Sciences in which I have addressed the study of the efficient management of Public Universities supported on the theoretical basis of productivity, taking as starting point the case of the National University of the Matanza of the Argentine Republic. The objective is to express in this synthesis, the criteria, conceptualizations, indicators and indices that, according to the results of the cited study, prioritize academic excellence. The method of the research here abbreviated has been of a quantitative nature corresponding to a hypothetical deductive design.
The Institution alluded to, has developed since its inception a functional structure corresponding to an alternative model that implies a new conception about the organization and university management. This new paradigm privileges a Public University with Academic Decentralization and Administrative Centralization.
The development of measures that promote an effective and sustainable university management and the consensus on the way in which the indicators measure it, constitute topics of relevance in the agendas of universities and governments. The improvement of a system of indicators associated with the results of the management of the universities, allows responding to social imperatives in the framework of public policies.
I present in this article the synthesized results obtained in the aforementioned research, exposing the conclusion of the same, with the purpose of opening lines of research and management based on efficiency and quality in university studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2003). “The Efficiency of Australian Universities: A Data Envelopnient Analysis”, Economías of Education Review, 22.

Asís, D. (2007). Análisis de eficiencia de los departamentos universitarios. El caso de la Universidad de Sevilla. Librería-Editorial Dykinson.

Clark, Burton R. (1992). El sistema de educación superior: una visión comparativa de la organización académica. México. UAM.

CONEAU (1997). Lineamientos para la evaluación institucional. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Cultura y Educación.

Coria, M. (2008). Eficiencia técnica de las universidades de gestión estatal en Ar-gentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires" - Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Departamento de Economía. Documento de Trabajo N.° 27.

Etkin, Jorge Ricardo; Schvarstein, Leonardo. (1993). Identidad de las organi-Lzaciones: invariancia y cambio. Buenos Aires. Paidós.

Laurent, J.; Fregosi, A.; Laguzzi, H. (1973). Organización departamental: do-cumentos para una reforma universitaria. Buenos Aires. CRUN.

Meneses Morales, Ernesto (1971). "La organización departamental en las univer- sidades". México: Revista del Centro de Estudios Educativos. VI, N.° 3, 1971.

McMaster, M. (2010). Partnerships between Administrative and Academic.

Mintzberg, Henry; Quinn James Brian; Voyer, John (1997). El proceso estratégico: conceptos, contextos y casos. México. Prentice-Hall.

(1991). Diseño de organizaciones eficientes. Buenos Aires, El Ateneo.

Secretaría de políticas universitarias (1998). La educación superior en Argentina: una visión compartida. Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Cultura y Educación.

The Snowball Project. Acceso y disponibilidad: <http://www.projectsnowball.info/wp-content/uploads/snowballproject.pdf>.

Vessuri, H. (1996). Pertinencia de la educación superior latinoamericana a finales del siglo XX. Nueva Sociedad Nro. 146 Noviembre-Diciembre 1996, pp. 102-107.