Main Article Content

José Nicolás del Río Castro
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Spain
Vol. 03 No. 07 (2011), Articles (open section), pages 111-123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/redma.2011.03.07.4741
Submitted: Nov 26, 2018 Accepted: Nov 26, 2018
How to Cite

Abstract

The popularity of Web 2.0, and specifically of social networks, has driven museums to be present in websites such as Facebook and Twitter, which are foreign to the museum field. The communication model used by these types of websites, based on opinions, comments and terse conversations, differs substantially
from the type of communication used by museums in their institutional websites. Adjusting the museum’s discourse to the format imposed by social media doesn’t mean to simply adjust the written message but to rethink its function. A follow-up of the activity in Facebook of the 15 most visited museums in the world during August, September, and October 2011, shows that social media do not seem to take advantage of a closer relationship between museums and their audiences. As a result, the social media’s potential is generally downgraded to a self-promotional tool. However, there are some examples of museums which, having gone beyond promotional objectives, show how the proximity with the public encourages the co-creation of museographic projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Febrero 2007; pp. 14-26. Recuperado el 7/10/2011 de http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.

Besser, H. (1997). The Transformation of the Museum and the Way it's Perceived. Recuperado el 12/10/2011 de http://besser.tsoa.nyu.edu/howard/Papers/garmil-transform.html.

El País (2007). Museos en el iPod. El País, 24 de diciembre de 2007. Recuperado el 4/9/2011 de http://www.elpais.com/articulo/cultura/Museos/iPod/elpepucul/20071224elpepicul_2/Tes

El País (2010). 'Minidebate' en el Congreso sobre el estado de la Cultura. El País, 24 de noviembre de 2010. Recuperado el 17/10/2011 de http://www.elpais.com/articulo/cultura/Minidebate/Congreso/estado/Cultura/elpepucul/20101124elpepucul_4/Tes

Flatt, Molly (2010). ¿Necesitan los museos a los medios de comunicación social, o más bien el boca a boca?. MUSE-A, Revista de los museos de Andalucía, Año 8, nº 12 de mayo de 2010; pp 34-39.

MacArthur, M. (2007). Can museums Allow Online Users to Become Participants? Recuperado el 7/10/2011 de http://www.aam-us.org/pubs/webexclusive/digitalmuseum.cfm

Marty, P. (2004). The Evolving Roles of Information Professionals in Museums. Recuperado el 9/10/2011 de http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Jun-04/marty.htm

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0?. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Recuperado el 2/9/2011 de http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

Rodá, C. (2010). De 1.0 a 2.0: el viaje de los museos a la comunicación social”. MUSE-A, Revista de los museos de Andalucía, Año 8, nº 12, mayo de 2010; pp. 22-33.

Simon, N. (2010). The Participarory Museum Santa Cruz, California: Museum 2.0.

The Telegraph (2011). Social networks beat entertainment sites as most popular UK online activity.The Telegraph, 16 de marzo de 2011. Recuperado el 17/09/2011 de http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/

/Social-networks-beat-entertainment-sites-as-most-popular-UK-online-activity.html.

Vogelsang, A. y Minder B. (2011). Audience+: A Holistic Approach to Developing Social Media Guidelines for Swiss Museums. Recuperado el 2/9/ 2011 de http://conference.archimuse.com/mw2011/papers/audience_a_holistic_approach_to_developing_soc.

Wired (2008). Encyclopaedia Britannica To Follow Modified Wikipedia Model. Wired, 9 de junio de 2008. Recuperado el 28/09/2011 de http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2008/06/ency.