Information processing style used by Compulsory Secondary Education students

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español)
Published: Oct 27, 2016

Main Article Content

Alfredo Campos
Adriana Castro
Biography
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016), Articles, pages 81-86
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2016.3.2.1763
Submitted: Jul 19, 2016 Accepted: Oct 27, 2016 Published: Oct 27, 2016
How to Cite

Abstract

Mental images are mental representations of people, objects and situations that are not present and are formed by using the imagination. Many studies have addressed this psychological ability, its typology and its involvement in the academic environment. Along these lines, the aim of our study was to assess the information processing style (verbal, object, spatial scales, and mental rotation) that is commonly used by students from different specialties of Compulsory Secondary Education. To that end, two tests: The Mental Rotation Test (MRT) and the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire (OSIVQ) were administered to a sample of 126 Compulsory Secondary Education students. MRT assessed any significant difference in the ability to mentally rotate images depending on gender and specialty. Significant differences were found by specialty, showing that science students had better ability to mentally rotate images than humanities ones. Significant differences were found by gender and specialty in the OSIVQ. Men showed better spatial and verbal processing style than women, and humanities students excelled in object processing (in comparison to science students) and in verbal processing (in comparison to science and art students).

Keywords:

mental image, mental rotation, imagery, cognitive processes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Alonso, M., & Campos, A. (2013). Las imágenes mentales de los estudiantes de ciencias y ciencias sociales. En R. González Cabanach, R. Fernández Cervantes, F. Fariña, M. Vilariño, & C. Freire (Eds.). Psicología y salud I: Educación, aprendizaje y salud (pp. 121-125). A Coruña: GEU.

Arnheim, R. (1979). Visual thinking in education. En A. A. Sheikh & J. T. Shaffer (Eds.), The pontential of fantasy and imagination (pp. 215-223). New York: Brandon House.

Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M.A. (2006a). Object-Spatial Imagery: A New self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20, 239–263. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1182

Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006b).Object and spatial imagery. Distinctions between members of different professions. Cognitive Processing, 7, S20-S21. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0047-9

Blazhenkova, O., Becker, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2010).Object–spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in children and adolescents: Developmental trajectories in relation to ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 281-287. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.012.

Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 638–663. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1473

Bors, D. A., & Vigneau, F. (2011). Sex differences on the mental rotation test: an analysis of item types. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 129-132. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.014

Campos, A. (2014). Gender differences in imagery. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 107-111. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.010

Campos, A., López-Araújo, Y., & Pérez-Fabello, M. J. (2016). Imágenes mentales utilizadas en diferentes actividades físicas y deportivas. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 16, 45-50. http://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/264411/196141

Campos, A., & Pérez-Fabello, M. J. (2011). Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire. PsychologicalReports, 108, 470-476. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.2466/08.22.27.PRO.108.2.470-476

Garrard, S. W. (1982). Sex differences, spatial visualization ability and the effects of induced and imposed imagery on problem solving performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 115-A.

Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kosslyn, S. M., & Koening, O. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.

Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-of in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 29-35. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.29

Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 47-77. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_3

Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Shepard, J. (2005). Spatial versus objet visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33, 710-726. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337

Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00213.x

Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pérez-Fabello, M. J., Campos, A., & Campos-Juanatey, D. (2016). Is object imagery central to artistic performance? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 67-74. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.006

Rhoades, H. M. (1981). Training spatial ability. En E. Klinger (Ed.), Imagery.Vol. 2. Concepts, results and applications (pp. 247-256). New York: Plenum Press.

Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599

Voyer, D. Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 17, 250-270. htpp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250