Main Article Content

Alfredo Rodríguez López-Vázquez
Universidade da Coruña
Spain
Vol. 1 (2014), Articles, pages 95-106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/digilec.2014.1.0.3662
Submitted: Jul 24, 2018 Published: Sep 17, 2018
How to Cite

Abstract

We analyze the presence of two figures within the painting Sunday afternoon at la Grande Jatte, by Seurat, the monkey and the Butterfly. Considering the scandal raised by the ape's presence, we conclude that the animal is a reference to lust and implicitly tells its owner's profession. The butterfly would be a symbol of frivolity and inconstance, which in combination with the monkey gives the painting a more ironic and less bucolic profile. We also analyze the work's composition process and its importance as a precursor of the 20th century vanguards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Burleigh, R. Seurat and La Grande Jatte : connecting the dots. New York: Harry N. Adams, 2004.

Chevalier, J. et Gheerbrant, Dictionnaire des Symboles, Paris: Robert Laffont, 1982.

Crary, J., Suspensions of Perception. Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture, Cambridge, Massachussets, MIT Press, 2001.

Fénéon, F. Georges Seurat et l’opinion publique, Paris: L‟Échoppe, 2010 (reimpresión de textos de 1926 a cargo de Maurice Imbert).

Fernández Polanco, A: Historia del Arte, v. 42: Fin de Siglo: Simbolismo y Art Nouveau, Madrid,: Gráficas Nilo, 1989.

Halperin, J.U. Félix Fénéon: Aesthete and Anarchist in Fin-de-sicèle Paris, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988.

Herbert, R.L., Seurat : Drawings and Paintings, Cambrdige: Mass.: Yale University Press, 2001.

Hutton, J. Neo-Impressionism and the Search for Solid Ground: Art, Science and Anarchism in Fin-de-Siècle France, Baton Rouge& London: Louisiana state University, 1994.

Laforgue, J. Mélanges Posthumes, Paris, Mercvre de France, 1923.

Rodríguez López-Vázquez, A., «Jules Laforgue, Tzara y Carmelo Bene: la vanguardia que no cesa», Revista Teatro, 24, 2012, pp. 111-122.

Signac, P. “Impressionistes et révolutionnaires”, La Révolte, 4-40, 1891.