Main Article Content

Maria Pura Moreno Moreno
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8086-2035
Biography
Vol. 10 (2020), Articles, pages 24-45
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/bac.2020.10.0.5768
Submitted: Oct 20, 2019 Accepted: Dec 1, 2020 Published: Dec 31, 2020
How to Cite

Abstract

The theory of the Oblique Function, created by the Architecture Principe group, questioned the horizontal stability of the ground, proposing to merge habitation and moving around, using the “inclisite” module. This article addresses the transposition of its foundations -more elaborate in territorial and urban areas- into domestic architecture, through four unbuilt projects with an oblique spatial habitability: the Maison Mariotti (1966), Maison Woog (1966-1968), Maison Toueg (1969-1970), and the prototype to inhabit, “Instabilisateur pendulaire IP” (1968). Their joint analysis seeks to recognize the intensity brought to the theory by the symbiosis between envelopes, complemented by factors such as tilting, gravity or mechanisms such as espace pincé. The aim will be to assess whether that legacy has materialized in contemporary architecture that highlights aspects such as fluidity, continuity and instability, and whether this transposition has meant scaling up at the cost of the domestic aspect, which is still awaiting true experimentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Bloomer, Kent C., y Charles W. Moore. Cuerpo, memoria y arquitectura: Introducción al diseño arquitectónico. Madrid: H. Blume Ediciones, 1982.

Brayer, M.A., y Frederic Migayrou. Architectures expérimentales: 1950-2000: Collection Frac Centre. Paris: Editions HYX, 2003.

Cortés, Juan Antonio. La estabilidad formal en la arquitectura contemporánea. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, 1991.

Fullaondo Buigas de Dalmau, Diego. “La iglesia de Sainte-Bernadette en Nevers: ¿Conclusión o principio oblicuo?.” En Blanco, no. 11 (2013): 12-17. https://doi.org/10.4995/eb.2013.6623

Jeanroy, Audrey. “Claude Parent: contradicteur et suiveur d'une modernité disgraciée,” en “Claude Parent: La pensée subversive, l'oeuvre perturbatrice.” numéro spécial, Bulletin Docomomo France, (Avril 2017): 5-13.

Migayrou, Frédéric, y Francis Rambert, eds. Claude Parent, l’œuvre construite, l’œuvre graphique. Orleans: X; Paris: Cité de l’architecture, 2010.

Moreno Moreno, María Pura. “El Pabellón de Venecia de Claude Parent (1970): huellas teóricas y legado conceptual de La Fonction Oblique.” Zarch, no.13 (diciembre 2019):190-207. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2019133942

Parent, Claude. Le carnet de la fracture. Paris: Manuella Éditions, 1994.

Parent, Claude. Errer dans l’illusion. Paris: Ed. Les architectures hérétiques, 2001.

Parent, Claude. Vivir en lo oblicuo. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili SL, 2009.

Parent, Claude, y Paul Virilio. Architecture principe, 1966 et 1996. Besançon: Les Editions de l'imprimeur, 1996.

Parent, Claude, y Paul Virilio. Claude Parent y Claude Virilio, 1955-1968: Arquitectos. Madrid: Alfaguara, 1968.

Parinaud, André, y Claude Parent. “L’Architecture oblique fait son entrée dans l’industrie.” La Galerie des arts, no. 70 (1er mai, 1969).

Ragon, Michel. Claude Parent: Monographie critique d’un architecte. Paris: Dunod, 1982.

Zevi, Bruno. “Encuentro con Parent.” Nueva Forma, no. 78-79 (1972): 7-10.