Transition from commitment to compliance: the efficacy of international human rights tribunals
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The fact that international law is characterized by the lack of unified system of sanctions and central enforcement authorities certainly weakens the normative character of international human rights obligations as well. After a brief description of the theoretical and practical problems relating to compliance with international law, this paper focuses on the contemporary challenges the international human rights mechanisms are confronted with. It is argued that in spite of the lack of centralized enforcement, the last decades witnessed the intensification and diversification of compliance procedures. Nevertheless, the persistent gap between commitment and actual compliance calls into question the efficacy of international human rights bodies. The paper analyses the weaknesses of the execution of the decisions of human rights tribunals, notably at universal level and in the European regional system. It is argued that despite the efforts to strengthen international supervision, all international human rights tribunals rely on national implementation. Thus, compliance ultimately depends on the political will of the States. Despite the relative strength of the oversight mechanism in the field of human rights, compliance has remained a domestic issue.
Keywords:
Downloads
Article Details
References
“Human rights violations first of all should be redressed at the domestic level and the Strasbourg Court should only be used as an ultimum remedium.” Presentation by LEO ZWAAK in the Working Session on the Implementation of International Human Rights Protections, available at http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/pdfs/Zwaak-speech.pdf
BANTEKAS, I. & OETTE, L., International Human Rights Law and Practice, Cambridge, 2013.
BOTHE, M., “Compliance”, Encyclopedia Entry, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law 2010.
BUYSE, A., “The Pilot Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: Possibilities and Challenges”, Nomiko Vima (Greek Law Journal), November, 2009.
ҪALI, B. & KOCH, A., “Foxes Guarding the Foxes? The Peer Review of Human Rights Judgments by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe”, Human Rights Law Review, 2014.
C. PARASKEVA, Human Rights Protection Begins and Ends at Home: The ‘Pilot Judgment Procedure’ Developed by the European Court of Human Rights, 2006, available at http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/shared/shared_hrlcpub/Paraskeva.pdf
HILLEBRECHT, C. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals. The Problem of Compliance, Cambridge, 2016.
HARRISON, J. and SEKALALA, S., “Addressing the compliance gap? UN initiatives to benchmark the human rights performance of states and corporations”, Review of International Studies, nº 41, 925-945.
HENKIN, L., How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, New York, 1968, p. 47.
HARRIS, D. J., O’BOYLE, M., BATES, E.P. & BUCKLEY, C.M., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd ed., Oxford, 2009.
JOSEPH, S. & SCHULTZ, J. & CASTAN, M., The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary, 2nd ed, Oxford 2004.
KELLER – ULFSTEIN, UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Law and Legitimacy, Cambridge 2012.
KOMANOVICS, A., “Strengthening Respect for International Humanitarian Law: Challenges and the Way Forward”, in n: Zs. Csapó (ed.), Emlékkötet Herczegh Géza születésének 85. évfordulójára. A ius in bello fejlődése és mai problémái, Pécs, 2013.
MÖLLER, J. T. & ZAYAS, A. de, United Nations Human Rights Committee Case Law 1977–2008: A Handbook, Kehl/Strasbourg 2009.
MURDOCH, J., Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe human rights handbooks, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2012.
NEUMAN, G. L., “Subsidiarity”, in Dinah Shelton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Oxford, 2013.
NOWAK, M., “The Need for a World Court of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Review, 7, no. 1, 2007.
RODLEY, N., “Role and Impact of Treaty Bodies”, in Shelton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Oxford, 2013.
SHAW, M. N., International Law, Cambridge, 6th ed., 2008.
SCHEININ, M., “The Human Rights Committee’s Pronouncements on the Right to an Effective Remedy – An Illustration of the Legal Nature of the Committee’s Work under the Optional Protocol”, in Nisuke Ando (ed), Towards Implementing Universal Human Rights: Festschrift for the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Human Rights Committee, Leiden 2004.
STEINER, H. J., & GOODMAN, R. & ALSTON, P., International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics and Morals, 3rd ed, Oxford 2000.
TOMUSCHAT, C., Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd ed, Oxford 2008.
UN OHCHR: Handbook for Human Rights Treaty Body Members, 2015, p. 52. http://ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR_PUB_15_2_TB%20Handbook_EN.pdf
WEISSBRODT, D., “Roles and Responsibilities of Non-State Actors”, in: D. Shelton (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, Oxford, 2013.