Reason without deliberation: philosophy, sociology and neuroscience
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the last two decades, the sociological scene has witnessed a process that could be described as “analytical turn”. Some sociologists have felt a need of recovering the principals of classical methodological individualism. In spite of “the analytical turn” has provided a great deal of conceptual clarity, methodological precision and scientific rigor, they have also been criticized by conceding an excessive importance to the role playing the deliberation in the human behavior. In this paper, our first aim is show the paramount role played by the dispositions in the social action. We base on the seminal work of Edmund Husserl, Pierre Bourdieu y Antonio Damasio. These authors have analyzed the existence of durable and stable inclinations that make difficult the pure deliberative process. We discuss their contributions and outline a critic conclusion.
Keywords:
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
References
Aquino, Santo Tomás de (1969). Suma teológica. Madrid: Editorial Católica.
Aristóteles (2011). Ética a Nicómaco. Buenos Aires: Tecnibook.
Barberá, Filippo (2006). “A star is born: On the Authors, Principles and Objectives of Analitical Sociology”, Papers, nº 80, 31-50.
Barberá, Filippo (2004). Meccanismi sociali. Elementi di sociologia analitica. Bolonia: Il Mulino.
Batlló, José (1970). La sociología de Marcel Mauss. Barcelona: Bailes.
Benjamisen, Lars (2003). “Causality and Social Ontology. On relational structures and cognitive rationality”, Research Networks no. 21, ESA Conference, Murcia.
Benabou, Roland y Tirole, Jean (2005). “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Policies”, Working Paper 11208, Cambridge, MA. National Bureau of Economicic Research.
Boudon, Raymond (1987). “The individualistic tradition on sociology”, en J.C. Alexander, et al. (Edits.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1962). “Célibat et condition paysanne”, Études rurales, nº 5-6, Abril-Septiembre, pp. 32-136.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1965). Un art moyen, essai sur les usages sociaux de la photographie. París: Éd. de Minuit. (con Castel, R., Boltanski, L. y J.-C. Chamboredon).
Bourdieu, Pierre (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de pratique, Ginebra: Droz.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1979). La distinction, Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éd. de Minuit. (trad. esp.: La distinción, Madrid: Taurus, 1998).
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980). Le sens pratique, Paris, Éditions de Minuit, 1980.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1996). Cosas dichas. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Bourdieu, Pierre y Wacquant, Loïc (1992). Reponses. Pour un antropologie reflexive. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Buscarini, Carlos (en línea). La noción de habitus en la fenomenología de Husserl, 15/08/12, http://es.scribd.com/doc/59125118/Buscarini-Habitus-en-Fenomenologia-de-Husserl.
Coleman, James (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Dijksterhuis, Ap (2006). “On the Making the Right Choice”, Science, 311, 1105-1107.
Hedström, Peter (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, David (1981). Investigación sobre el Conocimiento Humano, Madrid: Alianza.
Husserl, Edmund (2005): Meditaciones cartesianas, 15/09/12. México: FCE.
Gigerenzer, Gerd y Selten, Reinhard (2002). “Rethinking Rationality”, en Bounded Rationality: The adaptative Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Goldthorpe, John (2007): On Sociology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hirsch, P., Michaels, S. and Friedman, R. (1987). “'Dirty hands' versus 'clean model': Is sociology in danger of being seduced by economics", Theory and Society, Vol. 16, no. 3, 316-336.
Marqués, Ildefonso (2006). Génesis de la teoría social de Pierre Bourdieu. Madrid: CIS.
Mauss, Marcel (1971). Sociología y antropología, Madrid: Tecnos.
Mosterín, Jesús (2011). Aristóteles, Madrid: Alianza.
Morán, Dermont (2011). “Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology of Habituality and Habitus”, en Journal of British Society for Phenomenology, Vol.42, No.1, Enero.
Nisbet, Robert (1986). Conservadurismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Noguera, José Antonio. et al.(2010). Teoría sociológica analítica. Madrid: CIS.
Piketty, Thomas (1995). “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 551-584.
Quattrone, Georges y TvreskY, Amos (1988). “Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political science”, American Political Science Review, 82: 719-736.
Searle, John. (1997). La construcción de la realidad social, Barcelona: Paidós.
Spinoza, Baruch (2001). Ética, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Tvresky, A. y Kahneman, Daniel (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases", Science, 185: 1124-1131.
Vergnières, Solange (1995). Éthique et Politique chez Aristote. Paris: PUF.