Distributed control of a hemispherical drone shield for access denial to an area of interest

Authors

  • Salvador Zaragoza-Noguera Centro Universitario de la Defensa de San Javier (CUD)
  • María Guinaldo-Losada Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
  • José Sánchez-Moreno Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ja-cea.2026.47.13461

Keywords:

Autonomous systems, Cooperative navigation, UAVs, Consensus, Distributed control

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of access denial to an area of interest using a swarm of defending drones with single integrator dynamics that adopt a rigid hemispherical shield formation on a virtual quadratic surface. The distributed control law, based on the gradient of a potential function, simultaneously guarantees formation acquisition, maintenance of desired inter-drone distances, and positioning on the virtual surface. From this control law, the linear and angular velocity expressions required for the shield center to interpose between the protected target and the hostile swarm are derived, considering a moving target scenario. Additionally, the ability to dynamically modify the shield radius during operation is analyzed, identifying the limitations that arise when the scaling factor modification is anisotropic. Simulation results validate the approach in two scenarios: an ideal one with exact position information of the hostile drone and the target, and a more realistic one with noisy sensors, a Kalman filter and distributed consensus.

References

Alarifi, A., Al-Salman, A., Alsaleh, M., Alnafessah, A., Al-Hadhrami, S., Al-Ammar, M. A. & Al-Khalifa, H. S., 2016. Ultrawideband indoor positioning technologies: Analysis and recent advances. Sensors, 16(5), 707. DOI: 10.3390/s16050707

Anderson, B. D., Yu, C., Fidan, B. & Hendrickx, J. M., 2008. Rigid graph control architectures for autonomous formations. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 28(6), pp. 48–63. DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2008.929280

Eren, T., Belhumeur, P. N., Anderson, B. D. & Morse, A. S., 2002. A framework for maintaining formations based on rigidity. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 35(1), 499-504. DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.01308

ETID – 2020. Secretaría de Estado de Defensa, 2020. Estrategia de tecnología e innovación para la defensa.

Guinaldo, M., Sánchez-Moreno, J., Zaragoza, S. & Mañas-Álvarez, F.J., 2024. Distributed multi-UAV shield formation based on virtual surface constraints. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 176(104684). DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2024.104684

Hua, Y., Yu, J. & Sun, C., 2024. Distributed Control, Optimization, and Game of UAV Swarm Systems. Drones, 8 (Editorial) Special Issue. Oh, K.-K., Park, M.-C. & Ahn, H.-S., 2015. A survey of multi-agent formation control. Automatica, 53, pp. 424–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.10.022

Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A. & Murray, R. M., 2007. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1), pp. 215–233. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293

Queiroz, M. de, Cai, X. & Feemster, M., 2019. Formation Control of Multi-Agent Systems: A Graph Rigidity Approach. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118887455

Ren, W. & Sorensen, N., 2008. Distributed coordination architecture for multirobot formation control. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56(4), pp. 324–333. DOI: 10.1016/J.ROBOT.2007.08.005

Rodríguez-Canosa, G. R., Thomas, S., del Cerro, J., Barrientos, A. & MacDonald, B., 2012. A real-time method to detect and track moving objects (DATMO) from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) using a single camera. Remote Sensing, 4(4), pp. 1090–1111. DOI: 10.3390/rs4041090

Zaragoza-Noguera, S., Guinaldo, M. & Sánchez-Moreno, J., 2025. Protection of moving targets using a drone swarm. Jornadas de Automática, 46. DOI: 10.17979/ja-cea.2025.46.12181

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Ingeniería de Control