Surgery Approach of Haglund disease: review

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español)
Published: Oct 30, 2020

Main Article Content

Marta Lozano-Estepa
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Spain
Rubén Sánchez Gómez
Universidad Europea de Madrid
Spain
Israel Casado-Hernández
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Spain
Eva María Martínez-Jiménez
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Spain
Francisco Javier García-Carmona
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Spain
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020), Especial Communication, pages 26-35
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/ejpod.2020.6.1.5729
Submitted: Sep 9, 2019 Accepted: Mar 28, 2020 Published: Oct 30, 2020
How to Cite

Abstract

Objectives: To know which of the two surgical approaches is more effective and presents fewer complications for the treatment of Haglund's disease: endoscopic or open.
Material and methods: The Pubmed, Bucea, Enfispo and Dialnet databases were consulted from January 2003 to 2018, in Spanish and English, under the following terms: "Haglund's deformity", "Haglund treatment", "Haglund syndrome", "Diagnostic Haglund", "Haglund surgery", "Calcaneal osteotomy", "Haglund".
Results: Thirty-three articles were included for the realization of this work, of which thirteen were studies in which the comparison between open and endoscopic surgical treatment in subjects with Haglund deformity was shown. We included 393 subjects of whom 415 feet were operated (161 through endoscopy and 187 through open access). 58% of the subjects treated by endoscopy rated this treatment as excellent and reported complications, which were minor, were only present in 2 individuals, unlike those treated with open surgery, where 8 presented minor complications and 5 major complications.
Conclusions: The endoscopic approach have a higher percentage of satisfaction as well as a lower rate of complications.

Keywords:

achilles tendon, tendinopathy, endoscopy, surgery, literature review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Haglund P. Beitrag zur Klinik der Achilles tendon. Zeitschr Orthop Chir. 1928:49-48.

Jiménez Martín F, Alonso Valdazo MD, Díaz Peña G, Fernández Leroy J, Hernández Herrero D, Díaz García F. Haglund’s Syndrome. Two Case Reports. Reumatol Clínica (English Ed. 2017;13(1):37-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reumae.2015.12.005

Pavlov H, Heneghan M a, Hersh a, Goldman a B, Vigorita V. The Haglund syndrome: initial and differential diagnosis. Radiology. 1982;144(1):83-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.144.1.7089270

Reinherz RP, Smith BA, Henning KE. Understanding the pathologic Haglund’s deformity. J Foot Surg. 1990;29(5):432-435.

Biyani A, Jones DA. Results of excision of calcaneal prominence. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(1):45-49.

Le TA, Joseph PM. Common exostectomies of the rearfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1991;8(3):601-623.

Ahn JH, Ahn CY, Byun CH, Kim YC. Operative Treatment of Haglund Syndrome With Central Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(6):1053-1056. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.05.002

van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, Karlsson J, Maffulli N. Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(5):835-841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1374-z

Codina Santolaria J, Edo Llobet M, Marín Cop M, de la Rosa Fernández M, di Felice Ardente P. Vía de abordaje posterior en cuatro transaquílea en el síndrome doloroso del retropié: Haglund, pump bump y tendinitis calcificante del tendón de Aquiles. Rev del Pie y Tobillo. 2014;28(1):48-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2198(16)30021-0

Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Azizi AT, Vijay V. Haglund’s Syndrome: A Commonly Seen Mysterious Condition. Cureus. 2016;8(10):e820. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.820

10. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Informe ACFAS sobre la Deformidad de Haglund. 2006 [Internet].

Diab HS. Haglund’s syndrome: Classification system and surgical protocol. Curr Orthop Pract. 2016;27(6):633-637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000429

Lowdon A, Bader D, Mowat A. The effect of heel pads on the treatment of Achilles tendinitis: a double blind trial. Am J Sport Med. 1984;12:431-435.

Furia JP. High energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Am J Sport Med. 2006;34:733-740.

McGarvey WC, Palumbo RC, Baxter DE LB. Insertional Achilles tendinosis: surgical treatment through a central tendon splitting approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:19-25.

Pauker M, Katz K, Yosipovitch Z. Calcaneal osteotomy for Haglund’s disease. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1992;31:558-589.

Jiang Y, Li Y, Tao T, et al. The Double-row suture technique: A better option for the treatment of haglund syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1895948

Scholten PE, van Dijk CN. Endoscopic Calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:439-446.

Kaynak G, Ögüt T, Yontar NS, Botanlioglu H, Can A, Ünlü MC. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty: Five-year results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(4):261-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2013.3003

DeVries JG, Summerhays B, Guehlstorf DW. Surgical Correction of Haglund’s Triad Using Complete Detachment and Reattachment of the Achilles Tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(4):447-451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2009.03.004

Ögüt T, Yontar NS. Treatment of hindfoot and ankle pathologies with posterior arthroscopic techniques. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):230-240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160055

Wu Z, Hua Y, Li Y, Chen S. Endoscopic treatment of Haglund’s syndrome with a three portal technique. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1623-1627. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1518-5

Jerosch J, Nasef NM. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty--rationale, surgical technique, and early results: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(3):190-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0365-8

Schunck J, Jerosch J. Operative treatment of Haglund’s syndrome. Basics, indications, procedures, surgical techniques, results and problems. Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;11(3):123-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2005.04.003

Vega J, Baduell A, Malagelada F, Allmendinger J, Dalmau-Pastor M. Endoscopic Achilles Tendon Augmentation With Suture Anchors After Calcaneal Exostectomy in Haglund Syndrome. Foot Ankle Int. 2018:107110071775088. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717750888

Natarajan S, Narayanan VL. Haglund Deformity - Surgical Resection by the Lateral Approach. Malaysian Orthop J. 2015;9(1):1-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1503.006

Xia Z, Yew AKS, Zhang TK, Su HCD, Ng YCS, Rikhraj IS. Surgical Correction of Haglund’s Triad Using a Central Tendon-Splitting Approach: A Retrospective Outcomes Study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(6):1132-1138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.015

Kakwani R, Siddique M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Class Pap Orthop. 2014:217-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_53

Iversen JV, Bartels EM, Langberg H. The victorian institute of sports assesment-achilles questionnaire (visa-a)-a reliable tool for measuring achilles tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(1):76-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0096-z

Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using rasch analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099485

Mani SB, Brown HC, Nair P, et al. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(8):1140-1146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713483117

Ogilvie-Harris D, Mahomed N, Demazière A. Anterior impigement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs. J Bone Jt Surg. 1993;75-B:437-440.