Main Article Content

Argjira Bilalli
Faculty of Business and Economics, South East European University, North Macedonia
Albania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0215-5631
Fitim Mexhuani
Faculty of Economics, AAB College, Pristina, Republic of Kosovo
Albania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0817-0007
Medain Hashani
Faculty of Economics, AAB College, Pristina, Republic of Kosovo
Albania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-7250
Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026), Articles, pages 93-110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2026.15.1.12907
Submitted: 2025-12-11 Published: 2026-06-15
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

Using a panel dataset of six Western Balkan countries for the period 2010–2022, this study employs dynamic econometric models such as Fixed Effects (FE), Random Effects (RE), Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), and the Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) to examine the impact of financial development and institutional quality on environmental quality. The determinants of environmental quality considered in the analysis include economic growth, foreign direct investment, trade openness, and institutional quality. Institutional quality is measured as the average of political stability, regulatory quality, and corruption index.


Financial development is proxied by domestic credit to private sector. The findings indicate that both domestic credit to private sector and institutional quality have a significant positive impact on CO₂ emissions. This suggests that an increase in credit to the private sector leads to a significant increase in carbon emissions. Similarly, improved institutional quality is associated with increased emissions, a result that can be explained by the fact that countries with stronger institutions tend to attract investment and develop infrastructure, which can lead to higher economic activity, energy consumption and pollution. These results highlight the need for balanced policy approaches that support financial development and institutional improvement while also promoting environmental sustainability. The study offers valuable insights for policymakers in the Western Balkans to design integrated strategies that align financial and institutional progress with environmental protection goals.

Article Details

References

Acheampong, A. O. (2019). Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality?. Energy Economics, 83. 156-179.

Al-Mulali, U., Tang, C. F., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22,, 14891-14900.

Amin, A., Ameer, W., Yousaf, H., & Akbar, M. (2022). Financial development, institutional quality, and the influence of various environmental factors on carbon dioxide emissions: exploring the nexus in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 838714.

Babajić, A., Nurikić, M. B., Karabegović, N., & Nuhanović, A. (2024). Institutional Quality as a Determinant of Economic Growth : Analyzing GDP Trends in Western Balkan Countries.

Bayar, Y., Smirnov, V., Danilina, M., & Kabanova, N. (2021). Impact of institutions and human capital on CO2 emissions in EU transition economies. Sustainability, 14(1), 353.

Beka, A., Bilalli, A., & Gara, A. (2024). Assessing the Role of Economic, Financial, and Institutional Dynamics on CO2 Emissions: Comparative Analysis of OECD and Western Balkan Regions. Ekonomika, 103(3), 6-21.

Bilalli, A., & Sadiku, M. (2023). The Impact of Inflation on Financial Sector Performance: Evidence. From. Western Balkan Countries. SEEU Review, 18(2), 74-89.

Bilalli, A., Sadiku, M., & Sadiku, L. (2024). The impact of inflation on financial sector performance: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics, 12(2),, 263-276.

Bilgili, F., Alsanusi, M., Kabir, M. M., & Awan, A. (2025). Quantile dynamics of control of corruption, political stability, and renewable energy on environmental quality in the MENA region. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(6), 14001-14021.

Chen, F., & Jiang, G. (2023). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment: empirical analysis based on mediating and moderating effects. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja. 36(2).

Chhabra, M., Giri, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2023). Do trade openness and institutional quality contribute to carbon emission reduction? Evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(17), 50986-51002.

Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23,, 1203-1213.

Handoyo, S., & Fitriyah, F. K. (2018). Control of corruption, regulatory quality, political stability and environmental sustainability: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 1(2), 28-38.

Jamel, L., Maktouf, S., & Charfeddine, L. (2017). The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Econ Financ 5: 1341456.

Jianguo, D., Ali, K., Alnori, F., & Ullah, S. (2022). The nexus of financial development, technological innovation, institutional quality, and environmental quality: evidence from OECD economies. . Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(38), 58179.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Governance matters V: aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996-2005. (Vol. 4012). World Bank Publications.

Khan, H., Weili, L., & Khan, I. (2022a). Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 13356-13368.

Khan, H., Weili, L., & Khan, I. (2022b). The role of financial development and institutional quality in environmental sustainability: panel data evidence from the BRI countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(55), 83624-83635.

Khanday, I. N., Wani, I. U., & Tarique, M. (2023). Do financial development and institutional quality matter for ecological sustainability in the long run? Evidence from India. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(6), 1668-1689.

Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Ng, C. F. (2018). Role of institutional quality on environmental Kuznets curve: a comparative study in developed and developing countries. In Advances in pacific basin business, economics and finance (pp. 223-247). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Liao, H., Hao, G., Yasmeen, R., & Shah, W. U. (2024). Evaluation of educational resource utilization efficiency, regional technological heterogeneity, and total factor productivity change in 35 European countries. Plos one, 19(1), e0295979.

Maddison, D., & Rehdanz, K. (2008). Carbon emissions and economic growth: homogeneous causality in heterogeneous panels (No. 1437). . Kiel working paper.

Minović, J., Stevanović, S., & Aleksić, V. (2021). The relationship between foreign direct investment and institutional quality in Western Balkan countries. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 23(1), 40-61.

Negash, H. N. (2023). The Role of Institutional Quality in Financial Development: An Approach towards Emerging Economies. An Approach towards Emerging Economies.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University.

Panteli, M. e. (2022). The Impact of Institutions on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Europe. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 17(2), 125 141.

Sabir, S., Rafique, A., & Abbas, K. (2019). Institutions and FDI: evidence from developed and developing countries. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 1-20.

Shah, W. U., Hao, G., Yan, H., Shen, J., & Yasmeen, R. (2024). Forestry resource efficiency, total factor productivity change, and regional technological heterogeneity in China. Forests, 15(1), 152.

Shah, W. U., Wang, B., & Yasmeen, R. (2023). Evaluating the role of banking efficiency, institutions and financial development for sustainable development: Implications for Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Plos one, 18(10), e0290780.

Shah, W. U., Yasmeen, R., & Padda, I. U. (2019). An analysis between financial development, institutions, and the environment: a global view. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(21),, 21437-21449.

Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947-2953.

Shahbaz, M., Raghutla, C., Chittedi, K. R., Jiao, Z., & Vo, X. V. (2020). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index. Energy, 207, 118162.

Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J., Ahmad, N., & Alam, S. (2016). Financial development and environmental quality: the way forward. Energy policy, 98, 353-364.

Tamazian, A., & Rao, B. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy economics, 32(1), 137-145.

Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy, 37(1), 246-253.

Vatamanu, A. F., & Zugravu, B. G. (2023). Financial development, institutional quality and renewable energy consumption. A panel data approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 765-775.

Yasmeen, R., Li, Y., Hafeez, M., & Ahmad, H. (2018). The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: a global potential. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 34360-34379.

Zhang, Y. J. (2011). The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: An empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy, 39(4).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.