Main Article Content

Luzius Stricker
Institute for economic research IRE - Università della Svizzera italiana USI, Switzerland
Switzerland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1007-8605
Moreno Baruffini
Institute for economic research IRE - Università della Svizzera italiana USI, Switzerland
Switzerland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-6082
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020), Articles, pages 46-73
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2020.9.1.5714
Submitted: Aug 23, 2019 Accepted: Mar 28, 2020 Published: May 4, 2020
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the fourth partial revision of the law of unemployment insurance (AVIG) on unemployment dynamics in Switzerland at a cantonal level. The authors apply the Synthetic Control Method (SCM), a matching method for comparative case studies. A counterfactual analysis of the cases studied is performed by combining a control group of several untreated units, which provides a better comparison to the treatment group than a single unit. The control unit is designed as a weighted average of the available cantons in the donor pool, taking into account the similarities between the chosen controls and the treated unit. Once policy changes are controlled, the results suggest a significant effect on the unemployment rate at a cantonal level: the reform had a discernible impact on lowering the unemployment rate in the Italian- and French-speaking cantons in Switzerland.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J. (2003). ‘The Economic Costs for Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country’, American Economic Review, 93(1), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455188

Abadie, A., Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J. (2010). ‘Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746

Abadie, A., Diamond, A. and Hainmueller, J. (2015). ‘Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies’, American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12116

Acemoglou, D., Johnson, S., Kermani, A., Kwak, J. and Mitton, T. (2016). ‘The value of connections in turbulent times: Evidence from the United States’, Journal of Financial Economics, 121, 368-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.10.001

Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imbens, G. W. and Wager, S. (2019, February). ‘Synthetic Difference in Differences’. NBER Working Paper n. 25532. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25532

Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W. (2017). ‘The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.3

Billmeier, A. and Nannicini, T. (2013). ‘Assessing Economic Liberalization Episodes: A Synthetic Control Approach’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 983-1001. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00324

Cahuc, P., Carcillo, S., and Zylberberg, A. (2014). Labor Economics (second edition). The MIT Press, Cambridge.

Card, D. (1990). ‘The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labour Market’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399004300205

Card, D., Chetty, R., and Weber, A. (2007). ‘The Spike at benefit exhaustion: Leaving the unemployment system or starting a new job?’. American Economic Review, 97, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.2.113

Card, D. and Krueger, A. (1994). ‘Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania’, American Economic Review, 84, 772-793. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4509

Cavallo, E., Galiani, S., Noy, I. and Pantano, J. (2013). ‘Catastrophic Natural Disasters and Economic Growth’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1549-1561. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00413

Dormont, B., Fougère, D., and Prieto, A. (2001). ‘The effect of the time profile of unemployment insurance benefits on exit from unemplyoment’ (CREST Working Paper). Paris, http://www.crest.fr.

Doudchenko, N. and Imbens, G. (2016). ‘Balancing, regression, Difference-in-Difference and Synthetic Control Methods: a synthesis’, NBER Working Paper Series (22791). https://doi.org/10.3386/w22791

Dube, A. and Zipperer, B. (2015). ‘Pooling Multiple Case Studies Using Synthetic Controls: An application to Minimum Wage Policies’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 8944.

Eren, O. and Ozbeklik, S. (2016). ’What Do Right-to-Work Laws Do? Evidence from a Synthetic Control Method Analysis’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21861

Ferman, B., Pinto, C. and Possebom, V. (2017). ‘Cherry Picking with Synthetic Controls’, MPRA Paper (78213).

Ferman, B. and Pinto, C. (2019, January). ‘Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Pre-Treatment Fit’. Working paper.

Firpo, S. and V. Possebom (2018). ‘Synthetic Control Method: Inference, Sensitivity Analysis and Confidence Sets. Journal of Causal Inference 6 (2), pp. 1- 26. https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2016-0026

Galiani, S. and Quistorff, B. (2016). The synth_runner Package: Utilities to Automate Synthetic Control Estimation Using synth. College Park: University of Maryland. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801700404

Gardeazabal, J. and Vega-Bayo, A. (2017). ‘An Empirical Comparison Between the Synthetic Control Method and HSIAO et al.'s Panel Data Approach to Program Evaluation’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(5), 983-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2557

Gobillon, L. and Magnac, T. (2016). ‘Regional Policy Evaluation: Interactive Fixed Effects and Synthetic Controls’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00537

Hosny, A. S. (2012). ‘Algeria's Trade with GAFTA Countries: A Synthetic Control Approach’, Transition Studies Review, 19, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-012-0228-4

Jinjarak, Y., Noy, I. and Zheng, H. (2013). ‘Capital Controls in Brazil - Stemming a Tide with a Signal?’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 2938-2952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.007

Kaul, A., Klößner, S., Pfeifer, G. and Schieler, M. (2017, July 29). ‘Synthetic Control Methods: Never Use All Pre-Intervention Outcomes Together With Covariates’ available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83790/1/MPRA_paper_83790.pdf (accessed March 19, 2018).

Klößner, S. and Pfeifer, G. (2017). ‘Outside the box: using synthetic control methods as a forecasting technique’, Applied Economics Letters, 25(9), 615-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1352071

Klößner, S., Kaul, A., Pfeifer, G. and Schieler, M. (2017). ‘Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method Revisited: A Note on Abadie et al. (2015)’, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-017-0004-9

Kreif, N., Grieve, R., Hangartner, D., Turner, A., Nikolova, S. and Sutton, M. (2016). ‘Examination of the Synthetic Control Method for Evaluating Health Policies with Multiple Treated Units’, Health Economics, 25(12), 1514-1528. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3258

Li, K. T. (2017, June). ‘The Wharton School, the University of Pennsylvania’, available at https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/6_Kathleen-T-Li-Job-Market-Paper-Modified-Synthetic-Control-Method-1.pdf (accessed February 05, 2018).

Meyer, B. (1990). ‘Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells’. Econometrica, 58(4), 757-782. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938349

McClelland, R. and Gault, S. (2017). ‘The Synthetic Control Method as a Tool to Understand State Policy’, Research Report, Urban Insitute, Washington, available at https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/89246/the_synthetic_control_method_as_a_tool_0.pdf (accessed March 15, 2018).

Nannicini, T. and Billmeier, A. (2011). ‘Economies in Transition: How Important Is Trade Openness for Growth?’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00626.x

Possebom, V. (2017). ‘Free Trade Zone of Manaus: An Impact Evaluation using the Synthetic Control Method’. Revista Brasileira de Economia 71 (2), pp. 217-231. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20170011

Pellizzari, M. (2006). ‘Unemployment duration and the interaction between unemployment insurance and social assistance’. Labour Economics, 13(6), 773-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.10.003

Quistorff, B. (2016, March 22). ‘Inter-American Development Bank IADB – Blog’, The synth_runner Package: Utilities to Automate Synthetic Control Estimation Using synth:, available at https://blogs.iadb.org/desarrolloefectivo_en/2016/03/22/synth_runner (accessed February 06, 2018).

SECO Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft. (2013). ‘Bericht zur 4. Teilrevision des Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetzes (AVIG)‘, available at https://www.seco.admin.ch/dam/seco/de/dokumente/Arbeit/ALV/Grundlagen/Bericht_zur_4.Teilrevision_des_Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetzes_(AVIG).pdf.download.pdf/D_Bericht_zur_Teilrevision_des_Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetzes_(AVIG).pdf (October 17, 2017).

Tarrow, S. (2010). ‘The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice’, Comparative Political Studies, 43(2), 230-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009350044