Contemporary decision-making of mid-size city in the Czech Republic using Multiple Criteria Decision-making
The strategic planning process has been implemented into the local governance environment in the Czech Republic during last two decades. But the strategic goals that are expressed in the strategic development documents on the local level are only the part of the issues that are to be fulfilled or solved by the local government. In the everyday practical governance there is always a list of projects that appear from the actual technological, technical, public or political demand. The contemporary decision-making process is based on the personal or collective political decision or on the actual technical demand. But there are also municipalities that are already implementing strategic planning and want to avoid unsystematic interventions and decision-making processes. They try to adopt some attitudes from the corporate sphere to make the decision-making process more open and clear. This paper deals with the methodology of the mid-size city and tries to discuss it and offer some improvements. The paper’s other goals are to offer comparison of typical projects that could be found on the local level and to make a model of results provided by the different methodologies used for the decision-making process, specifically weighted sum average and analytic hierarchy process.
Barry. A. (2001). Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. the athlone press. London.
Bayazit. O. (2006). Use of Analytic Network Process in Vendor Selection Decisions. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 13(5). 566-579.
Bryson. J. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. 4th Edition. Wiley.
Cliff. N. (1996). Ordinal methods for behavioral data analysis. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Diederik. J. D. (2007). Analysis of Benefits. Opportunities. Costs and Risks(BOCR) with AHP-ANP: a critical validation. Mathematical and computer modeling. 46.892-905.
Gang. K., Daji. E., Yi. P., and Yong. S. (2013). Data Processing for the AHP/ANP. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.
Haile. M. (2014). Application of Analytic Network Process for the Assessment and Evaluation of Software Product. 15th International conference of PhD. Students young scientists and pedagogues. NITRA. 427-432.
Haile. M., Krupka. J., and Mastalka M. (2016). Evaluation of Strategic Planning Process Using Analysis of Fuzzy Integral. In 11th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied Informatics. Wolters Kluwer. The Netherlands. . 503-512.
Jia. X., Ping. F., and Peng. Y. (2016). Research of development strategy on China’s rural drinking water supply based on SWOT–TOPSIS method combined with AHP-Entropy: a case in Hebei Province. Environ Earth Sci. 75 (58).
Karim. R., and Karmaker. C. (2016). Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 4. 7-13.
Kurttila. M., Pesonen. M., Kangas. J., and Kajanus. M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy (AHP) in SWOT analysis – a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics. 1. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0
Liwen. V. (2001). Statistical Methods for the Information Professional: A Practical. Painless Approach to Understanding. Using and Interpreting Statistics (Children of the Promise). Information Today. 140.
Panos. M.P. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision-making Methods: a Comparative Study. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
Pozoukidou. G., Gavanas. N., and Verani. E. (2017). Sustainable management and strategic planning. Basingstoke. Taylor and Francis Ltd. retrieved from: https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/sdp/12/5/1522)
Prapawan. P. (2015). Application of the Multi Criteria Decision-making Methods for Project Selection. Universal Journal of Management. 3(1). 15-20.
Robert. A., Anu. J., Pasi. K., and Tatu. P. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix. University of Tampere Institute for Social Research Work Research Centre.
Ruscio. J . (2008). Constructing Confidence Intervals for Spearman ’ s Rank Correlation with Ordinal Data: A Simulation Study Comparing Analytic and Bootstrap Methods. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 7 (2). 416-434.
Rydin. Y. (2010). Planning and the technological society: Discussing the London plan. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 34(2). 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00901.x
Saaty. T.L. (1996). Decision-making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWS publications. Pittsburgh.
Saaty. T.L. (1999). Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. In: ISAHP. Kobe. Japan.
Saaty. T.L. (2001a). Decision-making with the Analytic Network Process and its “super decisions’ software: the national missile defense (NMD) example. In: ISAHP 2001 proceedings. Bern. Switzerland.
Saaty. T.L.( 2001b). Deriving the AHP 1-9 Scale from First Principles. In: ISAHP 2001 proceedings. Bern Switzerland.
Saaty. T.L.( 2005). Theory and Application of the Analytic Network Process: decision-making with benefits. opportunities. costs and risks. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh.
Saaty. T.L.( 2008). The Analytic Network Process. Iran J Oper Res. 1-27.
Shahroudi. K., and Tonekaboni. S. (2012). Application of TOPSIS Method To Supplier Selection In Iran Auto Supply Chain. Journal of Global Strategic Management. 6 (2). 123-131. https://doi.org/10.20460/JGSM.2012615779
Shrader. C.B., Lew. T., and Dan. R.D. (1984). “Strategic planning and organizational performance: A critical appraisal”. Journal of Management. 10(2). 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638401000202
Šilhánková. V. (2011). Indicators of Sustainable Development for Municipalities. Hradec Králové: Civitas per populi.
Spee. A.P., and Paula. J. (2011). Strategic planning as communicative process. Organization Studies. 32(9). 1217-1245.
Tramarico. C.. et al. (2015). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Supply Chain Management: a bibliometric study. Information Technology and Quantitative Management. Procedia Computer Science. 55. 441-450.
Vaidya. O., and Kumar. S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 169 (1). 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Wolf. C., and Steven. W.F. (2013). Strategic Planning Research: Toward a Theory-Driven Agenda. Journal of Management. 43(6). 1754-1788.
Yang. T., and Kuo. C. (2003). A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research. 147 (1). 128-136.
Yu-Cheng. T., and Thomas. W.L. (2011). Application of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Lead-free Equipment Selection Decision International. Journal of Business and Systems Research. 5 (1). 35-56.
Yuksel. I., and Dagdeviren. M. (2007). Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences. 177. 3364-3382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001
Copyright (c) 2018 Meaza Birhane Haile, Martin Mastalka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.